sooner becomes the concern of it being used to weaponize. As in Enrichment.
So using molten salt is "weaponizing" it? I didn't read that in any of your links.
You are the epitome of a dumb troll.
No U
I am not reading your fuck dumb links
You're not reading YOURS either, apparently.
20 percent less waste is still waste.
Where in the literature does it say %20?
don't care about its bullshit the nigger ad campaign it ain't even built yet
I think we can both agree... Fuck bill gates.
This isn't some "new" thing. OP is confused, as you were. It's not "sodium". This technology has been around a while and wasn't utilized PRECISELY because you can't weaponize the byproducts, because the byproducts are infinitely smaller.
If by "run off" you meant water, there is none. And if you want to split hairs about a tiny iota of starter material and call it %20 to cover up your confusion, then we can't have a conversation.
You shouldn't get so mad about technical information, it only proves you don't know what you're talking about.
It says it on your link title. 20%. Read your link title.
You have said to me you haven't read anything I posted. Instead in your dumb stupid head you have just trolled the top Google hit of a bullshit advertisement. The reactor which you claimed originally wasn't nuclear. Then you said it had no waste and no run off either. It is there for you to read. You are talking shit. It creates plutonium you didn't even know it did.
Read yourself you are the dumbest nigger posting, you have no comprehension. I literally think you are a stupid bot. You don't understand anything past your programming all it did was read a dumb advertisement. Then you argue like a child continuous stupid nonsense. I am done talking to a fucking nigger. Reply again no point.
Such a simple point nuclear reactors have waste, they emit, and they have run off. Only a dumb nigger would argue otherwise. Tedious.
The rest of what I said apart from my first comment has been fact unlike your bullshit. You didn't know it was nuclear. Then you presumed there was no waste. Then you said it didn't create plutonium. You argued run off, you are arguing enrichment, and nuclear fuel. What is the plutonium? Fuel it feeds back in. Enrichment when it fuels it more. No point in debating run off. You don't comprehend English. You talk bullshit nigger. You don't understand how the thing works. You didn't view any of the links I submitted either. Can it be weaponized. Undoubtedly a Senate review if it ģets sold internationally. At this point it hasn't been built.
Read back over your replies next time. You don't understand what you write from one minute to the next. Probably because like all niggers you are on drugs and have the dementia autism schizophrenia and bullshit.
So is it creating or enriching?
So using molten salt is "weaponizing" it? I didn't read that in any of your links.
No U
You're not reading YOURS either, apparently.
Where in the literature does it say %20?
I think we can both agree... Fuck bill gates.
This isn't some "new" thing. OP is confused, as you were. It's not "sodium". This technology has been around a while and wasn't utilized PRECISELY because you can't weaponize the byproducts, because the byproducts are infinitely smaller.
If by "run off" you meant water, there is none. And if you want to split hairs about a tiny iota of starter material and call it %20 to cover up your confusion, then we can't have a conversation.
You shouldn't get so mad about technical information, it only proves you don't know what you're talking about.
Fuck off you dumb nigger cunt.
You don't read, you troll.
It says it on your link title. 20%. Read your link title.
You have said to me you haven't read anything I posted. Instead in your dumb stupid head you have just trolled the top Google hit of a bullshit advertisement. The reactor which you claimed originally wasn't nuclear. Then you said it had no waste and no run off either. It is there for you to read. You are talking shit. It creates plutonium you didn't even know it did.
Read yourself you are the dumbest nigger posting, you have no comprehension. I literally think you are a stupid bot. You don't understand anything past your programming all it did was read a dumb advertisement. Then you argue like a child continuous stupid nonsense. I am done talking to a fucking nigger. Reply again no point.
Such a simple point nuclear reactors have waste, they emit, and they have run off. Only a dumb nigger would argue otherwise. Tedious.
The rest of what I said apart from my first comment has been fact unlike your bullshit. You didn't know it was nuclear. Then you presumed there was no waste. Then you said it didn't create plutonium. You argued run off, you are arguing enrichment, and nuclear fuel. What is the plutonium? Fuel it feeds back in. Enrichment when it fuels it more. No point in debating run off. You don't comprehend English. You talk bullshit nigger. You don't understand how the thing works. You didn't view any of the links I submitted either. Can it be weaponized. Undoubtedly a Senate review if it ģets sold internationally. At this point it hasn't been built.
Such a dumb fucking nigger
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2678551/when-to-encode-space-to-plus-or-20
Bruh... Those are fucking stand ins for spaces.
You know as much about reactors as you do HTML, which is to say nothing at all.
The more mad you get the more it proves your ignorance.
You are such a nigger here is what you sent me
https://www.anthropoceneinstitute.com/science/generation/msr/#:~:text=MSR%20generates%20less%20waste%20than,efficient%20at%20burning%20transuranic%20elements
Read back over your replies next time. You don't understand what you write from one minute to the next. Probably because like all niggers you are on drugs and have the dementia autism schizophrenia and bullshit.
I only read the title of link. It says. Dumbass.
Know how reactors work you clearly don't.
I know what I fucking sourced, guy. It's not 20 percent any-fucking-thing.
You have less than 20 percent the brain capacity of any blacks, genius.