Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

20
Gates and Buffett to create a new kind of nuclear reactor in Wyoming -- they purposefully say "Natrium" instead of Sodium for some reason (www.theguardian.com)
posted 4 years ago by MediaMadeMe 4 years ago by MediaMadeMe +20 / -0
71 comments share
71 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
▲ 2 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

is sodium harmful to the environment

Irrelevant because that's not what makes MSRs work, buckaroo.

chemical process, create run off.

What process and what "run off"?

Now answer how using sodium was so much better than carbon

What carbon? You mean coal? Did you mispell cesium?

if you're bullshit and stupid

No, U

since have had really dumb little bitches tell me really stupid things.

I can relate

The paper shits some advertising, next they're getting vaccinated for free and now their face is crooked, they can't have kids, and their brain is cloted, and their heart is enlarged, then they're in a coma but the press told them to swallow.

Sir, this is a Wendy's.

don't care about your Chernobyl

Pretty relevant when discussing how safe reactors are.

it doesn't have the same output.

And electric cars don't have the same output as gas. What's the point? Are you making an argument or just making observations?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Ep0ch -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

Electric cars are actually worse for the environment. How many more emissions are used in making brand new car manufacture. Rather than in the previous vehicles already manufactured and in use. It will take at least 3 generations of EVs to pay off that debt. Which they won't because they break quicker. Where does the energy come from. Many are still using coal power. Solar and wind need even more costs for the greater demand of even more energy being used, neither are environmental. Ewaste isn't being recycled according to the increasing demand we have already changed epochs from it. Panels contain acids lead and plastic forgetting the battery. Turbines are made from carbon fibre. Regardless, how long do EVs last. The battery lasts about 7 years. Electricity is the first product to break in every car. Most people can't repair those parts. Costing even more services and lessening lifetimes. Every product used creating more emissions to reproduce. Unlike previous gas cars averaging much longer lifetimes for every part. EVs don't recycle like gas cars they are largely ewaste. Their batteries are also much worse environmentally for recycling.

But we are talking about your bullshit, the turbine is a vent. It has hot and cooled processes requiring water. It is a resource being depleted. If it isn't full of the production. Like nuclear water.

Aside from the run off of the constant resources needed to create its energy.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

It has hot and cooled processes requiring water.

No. MSRs are self contained.

Aside from the run off

What "run off"? You mean like the diesel required to ship materials?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Ep0ch 0 points 4 years ago +1 / -1

The nuclear waste. It is a nuclear reactor we were talking about one stage of its production where it still enriches uranium and also creates nuclear fuel.

Outside of it also storing the excess heat.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– DavidColeIntrepid 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

where it still enriches uranium

Uranium isn't enriched by using it as fuel, and I thought we were talking about molten salts.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy