People had to sit still for minutes back then as film iso was crap, so any shots on a battlefield would just be blurs.
Plus I'm sure theres thousands of attempted pics on glass plates from that time showing wartime, just weren't published, but most likely out there ..
Plus we have shitloads of evidence, you can go metal detect and find your own evidence to keep.
Here's a book from 1912, "A Photographic History of The Civil War".. There's tons of photographs allegedly right before a battle, then right after a battle, at the union camps, an army walking through towns, etc. No hard evidence of the Confederate army.
People had to sit still for minutes back then as film iso was crap, so any shots on a battlefield would just be blurs. Plus I'm sure theres thousands of attempted pics on glass plates from that time showing wartime, just weren't published, but most likely out there .. Plus we have shitloads of evidence, you can go metal detect and find your own evidence to keep.
Find what? Bullets? Maybe a horseshoe?
Canon balls, guns, cannons, bullets, coins, anything metal that's left behind during war...
Yeah. And? Appears to be only one army. Some guy on here said they couldn't photograph well enough back then. https://archive.org/stream/photographichist02mill#page/n9/mode/1up
Here's a book from 1912, "A Photographic History of The Civil War".. There's tons of photographs allegedly right before a battle, then right after a battle, at the union camps, an army walking through towns, etc. No hard evidence of the Confederate army.
You think in the heat of a battle they have time to call a time out so both forces can stop and pose for 3 minutes for photos? Come on man.