Within their suggested environment (the digital fiction); which they try to expand by exporting as many jobs as possible into "remote" positions aka in front of the controlled fiction. This will really devastated most of the weak; but inspire the strong minded to resist even harder. What needs to be counteracted is them using remote isolation to indoctrinate their slaves into shunning real social interaction.
They're gonna ride that pandemic hoax to keep as many mid sized gatherings closed (aka not fully controlled like stadium events) to shift society as a whole towards consent to self imposed isolation. Working from home will be propagandized and most likely rewarded (universal basic income + social credit for participation).
Right vs wrong represents the conflict of reason, which is caused by consent to believe in suggested right or wrong definitions of reality.
What if reality operates within motion and holding onto any belief restricts one to comprehend that?
Can it be defined as "right" information if it's constantly changing, and does nature offer wrong information to ones perception?
Could others make suggestions to get one to consent to ignore reality, and could a simple (instinctive) reality be covered up by complex suggestions?
Within their suggested environment (the digital fiction); which they try to expand by exporting as many jobs as possible into "remote" positions aka in front of the controlled fiction. This will really devastated most of the weak; but inspire the strong minded to resist even harder. What needs to be counteracted is them using remote isolation to indoctrinate their slaves into shunning real social interaction.
They're gonna ride that pandemic hoax to keep as many mid sized gatherings closed (aka not fully controlled like stadium events) to shift society as a whole towards consent to self imposed isolation. Working from home will be propagandized and most likely rewarded (universal basic income + social credit for participation).