Before. Well before. Commie faggots have infiltrated the Catholic Church since the 1960s.
But if you want to talk about diddling little kids, let us talk about Mohammed's 6 year old wife, and the Mohammedian practice of using boys for pleasure and women for breeding.
Again, Christianity spread primarily by conversion, not the sword. Sorry if historical facts impede your narrative. Now, what was that again about fairy tales?
Was it going on before the 1960s, sure. It was going on at the time Christ, you dope who doesn't know human nature, because Christ said in the first century to cut that perverted stuff out, and St. Paul said to leave that shit for the pagans to do to each other.
I suppose I have to unnecessarily make the distinction that commie faggots infiltrated the church in the 1960s set about to make faggotry acceptable, and the fruits of that were countless alter boys molested. Even today, the faggots protect each other from the law. But prior to the 1960s, that wasn't the case.
I got a good chuckle out of your ignorance as well. Did the fedora fall off when you spit out your coffee?
What we have here, found in it's natural habitat, is the "edgelord atheist" who when confronted with facts that are uncomfortable to him, often uses the classic escape maneuver of saying that they don't want to take the time to debate. This is the second most common escape tactic.
Most commonly, the "edgelord atheist" will use the tactics of another spineless creature, the octopus, and release a cloud of ink. After using a wall of text and copy pasta to create the "virtual ink cloud", if those they are debating do not respond to all 635 main points and 1,321 sub-points, the edgelord atheist subjectively deems it a "failure to respond" and will claim a "win" of internet points before moving onto his next victim of time theft.
Read Ezekiel 22:17-22.
The state of Israel exists for a reason.
Christianity converts by preaching, not the sword.
but, but, muh Crusades
Whatever, it was in a response to hundreds of years of Jihad.
Are you talking to me? I think you misinterpret my defense of Christianity not being violent.
Before. Well before. Commie faggots have infiltrated the Catholic Church since the 1960s.
But if you want to talk about diddling little kids, let us talk about Mohammed's 6 year old wife, and the Mohammedian practice of using boys for pleasure and women for breeding.
Again, Christianity spread primarily by conversion, not the sword. Sorry if historical facts impede your narrative. Now, what was that again about fairy tales?
Was it going on before the 1960s, sure. It was going on at the time Christ, you dope who doesn't know human nature, because Christ said in the first century to cut that perverted stuff out, and St. Paul said to leave that shit for the pagans to do to each other.
I suppose I have to unnecessarily make the distinction that commie faggots infiltrated the church in the 1960s set about to make faggotry acceptable, and the fruits of that were countless alter boys molested. Even today, the faggots protect each other from the law. But prior to the 1960s, that wasn't the case.
I got a good chuckle out of your ignorance as well. Did the fedora fall off when you spit out your coffee?
What we have here, found in it's natural habitat, is the "edgelord atheist" who when confronted with facts that are uncomfortable to him, often uses the classic escape maneuver of saying that they don't want to take the time to debate. This is the second most common escape tactic.
Most commonly, the "edgelord atheist" will use the tactics of another spineless creature, the octopus, and release a cloud of ink. After using a wall of text and copy pasta to create the "virtual ink cloud", if those they are debating do not respond to all 635 main points and 1,321 sub-points, the edgelord atheist subjectively deems it a "failure to respond" and will claim a "win" of internet points before moving onto his next victim of time theft.
Bye, sugar tits.