.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
.
Well, there is at least one distinct difference, and that's FGM removes the clitoris and most ability to have sexual pleasure. A circumcision doesn't do that.
That said, no Christian should circumcise their child. They resolved this as not necessary for Christians, WAY back in the 1st century when the original Apostles were still alive.
Isn't it impossible to say cutting of a part of your dick makes less difference?
The foreskin doesn't have the practical function of generally preventing orgasms and sexual pleasure, and thus dulling the sex drive. It's part of what makes us human. Your taking a portion of their humanity away with FGM.
I say it does. My fs is amazing!!!!! And keeps out stuff from the eye and keeps the membrane of the Penis covered The same thing was said about dogs tales correct. Now we stopes cutting of the dogs tales.
How could any one know?
Your talking about taken away the humanity what they want to do in their culture why do the west interfere. While Chopping off boys foreskin?
Let me be more clear, FGM mostly prevents orgasms and dulls the sex drive. It takes a portion of person's humanity away because the sex drive is partially what makes us human.
That said, I'm sure your foreskin is just peachy.