.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
.
The foreskin doesn't have the practical function of generally preventing orgasms and sexual pleasure, and thus dulling the sex drive. It's part of what makes us human. Your taking a portion of their humanity away with FGM.
I say it does. My fs is amazing!!!!! And keeps out stuff from the eye and keeps the membrane of the Penis covered The same thing was said about dogs tales correct. Now we stopes cutting of the dogs tales.
How could any one know?
Your talking about taken away the humanity what they want to do in their culture why do the west interfere. While Chopping off boys foreskin?
Let me be more clear, FGM mostly prevents orgasms and dulls the sex drive. It takes a portion of person's humanity away because the sex drive is partially what makes us human.
That said, I'm sure your foreskin is just peachy.
There are over a dozen subcategories of FGM. What you described is Type III, infibulation, where the external clitoris, hood, and labia are removed with the vagina stitched almost shut. This is also the rarest type. Type IV is the most common worldwide -- scraping, incising, piercing. Essentially, fully functional genitals.
Routine circumcision in the US was originally promoted as a way to curb masturbation. If we are to believe that FGM is wrong on the basis that it's meant to suppress female sexual pleasure, the same reasoning can be applied to circumcision, regardless of who is promoting the practice.