.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (51)
sorted by:
.
That's my point I av no eye dear
Male circumcision:
-only foreskin removed.
-can still achieve erection.
-can still ejaculate.
-nearly fully functional afterwards.
-slightly harder to masturbate (not a bad thing, necessarily).
-glans stays intact (majority of nerve concentration).
-sex is enjoyable and can achieve orgasm.
Female mutilation:
-glans and surrounding skin are sliced and diced and/or removed entirely.
-erections difficult or impossible (healthy females do have erections, so please).
-ejaculation is painful or impossible.
-stimulation is painful or impossible.
-orgasm is painful or impossible.
-sex is not nearly as enjoyable if at all.
-victim becomes an object for sex and otherwise.
Probably some other stuff.
Sounds like propergand from the west. Have you spoken to girls not in the west who have had this treatment/traditions?
So it OK to injury boys in the west but not black girls in the rest of the world you say. I think I just realised that white supremacists is a real thing.
And its also OK to mutilate baby boys ?
Did you copy and past it or you have a interest? Do you think women are victims or the guilty party's in this?
Are you brainwashed? We cherish our women and girls and we do not attempt to “own” them unlike how you people prefer to subjugate your women and girls due to the tendency of your males to be weak and fragile when they become “men”.
Aside: your males are probably weak because Mohammad himself was a weak scared little boy (almost like a girl) throughout his life.