Change my mind?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Hey, I've had this random thought before. It seemed strange to me that you rarely saw women speak up about Pizzagate, but it dawned on me as to why.
It's almost just like that mama bear reference. Mothers are innately protective of their own, and while they may get emotional over harm done to other children, deep down they really don't care to an extent, because it's not really kicking in the maternal instincts. I don't think paternal instinct is quite the same, and perhaps the degree of separation makes a difference.
Feminists obviously squelch their maternal qualities, and in doing so may lose their most basic instincts.
Suppression of instincts is probably true. The extreme radicals condition themselves to hate traditional feminine behavior. Biology doesn't go away, though. It's probably why they go insane at some point.
I think the Ba'alaket intention might have been to guide women to fight for their society, but it got sidelined when the Kayeen turned it into the trick it is now by tricking women into thinking in terms of personal convenience and education rather than their natural instincts. The benefit for the Kayeen being that women willingly "donate" their genetic material to the pool through abortions and the Kayeen have a larger "menu" of potential "overwriting" targets.
EDIT: One thing RD and Garbotalk made evident is that Pizzagate is totally a Kayeen thing. The Kayeen are the pedos because their natural form is a big eyed, tall humanoid form and the proportions of children remind them of themselves at a visceral level. They taught the Deep State these behaviors and use it as a blackmail system. The two people I know Garbo and RD have confirmed are Kayeen are Nancy Pelosi and Jeffrey Epstein.
So, I'm flipping through RD's stuff, and he said something rather uncanny.
Ok, so I went through a bit of a spiritual awakening four and half years ago, and I wrote an essay that was like a primer on Christianity.
In the beginning, I addressed money, "As my mother just recently corrected me, “The love of money is the root of all evil”. I keep thinking it is just “Money is the root of all evil”, but money itself is just a tool. I even find the production and variation in currency to be of great beauty, because people have used just about everything to trade and barter throughout time, from coins to giant rolling rocks to grains of rice. Even the salt of the earth itself was a huge moneymaker in its heyday. But I digress. My point is simply that money has had its heyday as well; there will always be importance to money, but there is certainly room to embrace other forms of exchange."
I circled back around at the end with this bit, "I struggle daily with who I see myself as and who I really am, but at least I have the knowledge that my self-image is but a figment of my imagination, and that reality is a different entity. Therein lies the true nature of “reality” as a whole, but in the most important human aspect. In that way can you see the value of objectivity, without disregarding each person’s subjective experience. The effort to THINK and GROW from your thought is essential to life. It is life. Try it. There will be pain and suffering, but the chance to understand beauty and love that are unattainable otherwise is worth the cost of admission. So use your real currency, and value it."
He speak a few times on it:
"Let this endeavor be a part of this world’s history to establish its informational currency sovereignty.
You must have currency sovereignty.
Your currency is your own."
Also,
"Our currency is INFORMATION-BASED.
This is an inevitability when a species has been mining asteroids for millennia and gold loses its luster."
Interesting, no?
Information based currency has some rather interesting implications, yeah. One thing I get from this is it's not his goal to control people or tell people what to think. More to supply information and let people work out how they interpret it themselves.