Totally agree the real way to battle this is to understand the technology and replicate it for our own purposes. Build servers, create websites that cant ge accessed via conventional browsers. Communication is key and not keeping up with technology will only benefit the government. I would love to unite with this group and create something like this. No offense to Axo but this is what is needed and I hope they come on board with such a solution.
How to sustain and grow "censorship"? By using the conflict of reason (truth vs false) of those who believe/not believe in the offered idol called "censorship"; to keep arguing within fiction (beliefs), while ignoring reality (motion).
Meanwhile what does censorship set into motion causes? More censorship. So to keep the censorSHIP flowing within motion; the merely suggest fiction in exchange for consent to ignore motion (reality).
If they then also suggest contradictions (talmudic reasoning) to both sides of the conflict of reason; the velocity of the censorSHIP increases; causing even more corruption.
The way out? Don't claim anything; use everything, and when they send the censor by to impose upon ones property...ONE will be within ALL.
Pffffffft if only that were the case. Dicksuck users still lash out at me when I point out how pozzed the platform is and how the company weaponizes the "anonymous" data they give it, because "muh convenience" and "free and open software is evil" (no they're actually lazy conformist dipshits too comfortable with the status quo since they haven't been singled out specifically)
Totally agree the real way to battle this is to understand the technology and replicate it for our own purposes. Build servers, create websites that cant ge accessed via conventional browsers. Communication is key and not keeping up with technology will only benefit the government. I would love to unite with this group and create something like this. No offense to Axo but this is what is needed and I hope they come on board with such a solution.
How to sustain and grow "censorship"? By using the conflict of reason (truth vs false) of those who believe/not believe in the offered idol called "censorship"; to keep arguing within fiction (beliefs), while ignoring reality (motion).
Meanwhile what does censorship set into motion causes? More censorship. So to keep the censorSHIP flowing within motion; the merely suggest fiction in exchange for consent to ignore motion (reality).
If they then also suggest contradictions (talmudic reasoning) to both sides of the conflict of reason; the velocity of the censorSHIP increases; causing even more corruption.
The way out? Don't claim anything; use everything, and when they send the censor by to impose upon ones property...ONE will be within ALL.
Pffffffft if only that were the case. Dicksuck users still lash out at me when I point out how pozzed the platform is and how the company weaponizes the "anonymous" data they give it, because "muh convenience" and "free and open software is evil" (no they're actually lazy conformist dipshits too comfortable with the status quo since they haven't been singled out specifically)