Bombshell testimonial reveals that George Floyd did not die of drug overdose
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
Yawn what a load of bullshit. You discount the alcohol level and just let them drive officer. Individual intake varies despite their alcohol level and their erratic behaviour. Just let them drive. Get rid of the breathalyser. Alcohol levels are redundant. Drunks have a resistance. Let them drive.
Somebody get a new bombshell in. Laugh that idiot out of the court.
Well, anything? So far you have only produced some racists rants. Present some facts, please.
The word nigger ain't racist. It is a word. It isn't hate speech. It is free speech. Racism is an action not your feelings. Where calling me racist is so hurtful. You dumb nigger.
What are you babbling about? Toxicology means whatever amounts are considered, affect the outcome. My example was alcoholics same with drug users being unable to drive from being breathalyser tested. There is no resistance to a reading stating their toxicology. This is variable per drunk, perhaps some can take more before a reading, but the limit set means there is a severe reaction impairing their ability. That fucking dumb argument by that drunk coroner, throws out the breathalyser, suggesting there is no toxicology because the drug user had a resistance to intake. Bullshit. He had a huge amount in his system potentially fatal. Like the drunk killed in a car crash. Being drunk killed them. They couldn't drive. How therefore should a cop treat the druggie? They would die of a heart attack anyway. Massive internal damage on their organs huge amounts in their system. Being on drugs killed the druggie, not the same restraint done on everybody else causing no death. Of course there might have been negligence but it wasn't manslaughter when the druggie drops dead regardless. Do I agree with the cops. Not the argument. I don't persay agree with the restraint used. But it has been used before drop dead druggie croaked. He resisted arrest and was a frothing crackhead. What can they do. Certainly not get done for manslaughter, it wasn't their intent. It wasn't even accidental. Because it hasn't happened prior in the restraint used, but perhaps that restraint has previously caused injury. Not the debate.The fault was from the druggie.
So again I ask: elaborate on this. How do you know? What is your expertise? Why does your knowledge supercede that of a trained forensic expert?
Have you reviewed the evidence that is being discussed at the trial? Why do you come to another conclusion than the expert witness and on what basis?
Less rants, more facts, please.
Or just admit that you are just a dumb loudmouth and don't know what the fuck you are talking about and are just making shit up.
That is much more likely than you being some kind of expert with access to evidence that private citizens don't have access to.
The only person ranting is yourself, you are trolling me with bullshit, because you are as thick as a piece of excrement.
This is because you are foreign. You have lost the ability to communicate. What is my expertise on a forum. I presented an argument. You dumb nigger. An argument you haven't answered in any other regard apart from being a mindless stupid trolling nigger. Asking me my professional experience on a forum. That is really dumb. My experience speaks for itself. I have the ability to put forward an argument. Something a real dumb nigger like yourself hasn't done. Instead you have tried to troll my argument. By failing to answer it. Where is your reply outside of an assumption that mysteriously I have to provide some credentials to a stupid nigger like yourself. I owe you nothing nigger. What I say means nothing towards the outcome of this press. It was simply a point of debate. A point of debate you haven't debated except in retarded nigger stupidity. Childish dumb incomprehensible ranting gibberish.
Where is your counter argument towards why the toxicology levels mean an amount in the bloodstream that is otherwise clearly the cause of death. In every other instance. Like the drunk crashing the car. What is the cause of death. Car crash, or the toxicology in the bloodstream. Hint the toxicology is. This why people are still driving cars. Not everybody crashes them. The same with a heart attack being that cause in a car crash.
The toxicology has been disregarded here in this press by a drunk coroner ruling out that cause. You have had no argument to this. It is conspiratorial. You dumb nigger. You are ignorant.
The cause of death wasn't kneeling on the neck. It was the drugs in his bloodstream causing a heart attack. If you read the press presented. His bloodstream had the toxicology, a huge amount of intake, where drugs were in his bloodstream, and his internal organs were clearly damaged, and also by sustained drug use. There is no resistance to organ failure, they fail. Drug users die sooner than everybody else, because of a direct result of their addiction, their organs fail. Heath Ledger he takes more or less the same cocktail of drugs he had every other knight in rehearsal, but he died because of organ failure. It eventually killed him. No resistance. Toxicology rules Ledger died of drugs. They caused organ failure.
Sure this situation was heightened by the arrest, it caused his blood pressure to climb. How are cops supposed to handle it? There is a crack head resisting arrest. They use the same technique they have used prior on everybody else, it was legal until this case, too restrain him. Then druggie drop dead George croaks his last Floyd. How is it their fault for not being medical professionals and instead restraining a maniac. A frothing lunatic druggie who needed open valve heart surgery because he was a walking heart attack. Read his rap sheet.
Nice wall of text.
I have asked you to present your evidence and instead you go on another baseless rant.
You have nothing to present, just admit it. Literally everything you claim is made up with no basis in facts.
How fucking pathetic does one have to be to write all this bullshit instead of admitting that your opinion is based on wishful thinking and not facts.
Go back to school and learn how to present an argument you ignorant child.
Evidence of what. You have accused me of not being a coroner. Because you are dumb stupid nigger troll. You are using a multiple account to bait me into your childish nigger absurdity. I have spoken to you already many times before in a range of topics, you say nothing except attack me. You don't speak. You accuse me. Of what. It is ridiculously stupid.
I don't have to submit anything to a retarded little nigger like yourself. Even if I was a coroner I wouldn't tell you. It isn't my case. You dumb nigger.
Listen to yourself, admit what. What, I have said already. Something you cannot argue, without trying to attack me, in your mindless supidity. Read what you wrote, it is retarded. It is ignorant, it is stupid. It was written by a nigger. You have a brain that thinks of shit, because it is full of it.
You haven't made a counter argument towards toxicology levels, because you are far too stupid to even understand them. Probably because you are on fentanyl yourself. Wall of text. You haven't debated it. Dumbass. Yes I have submitted evidence repeatedly, in both comparisons used, and also by this very press stating he had drugs in his system, large amounts, past the limit, and he had organ failure from the damage to his organs. Something both the defense and previous coroner had ruled. Please reiterate where the sustained bruising was to his neck instead. Where is the evidence of it causing death? Unlike the toxicology? We have a drunk cuck coroner ruling out the breathalyser, the toxicology, and making up bullshit.
Now fuck off. I have nothing to say to a person who is retarded. You have not debated anything with me, because you are far too stupid. Answer me again in your ignorance and I won't reply. Anybody else reading can make up their own mind on which of us is sane.
All the claims you are making. You just keep rambling on about stuff that you claim happened without providing a single piece of evidence.
Utterly pathetic. What a failure you are. You just make up stuff on and on and you don't even realize how meaningless it all is.
I could claim that Floyd was killed by invisible goblins and that claim would have as much merit as the bullshit you are writing.
Evidence, do you understand the word?
Go, you're stupid. What a fucking loser. What you are doing might be sufficient in your usual racist circlejerk that you have but does not even meet the standard that children learn at school when constructing an argument.
Go back to school you useless incel.
Tell me more about how you know more than a forensic medical expert, please.
You also obviously have reviewed all the evidence that was presented at court and which formed the basis for the testimony. How do you even have access to it?
Oh look it's the household nigger on another multiple account. Fuck off nigger.
It should stand to reason there is no argument in claiming resistance. When by law there is toxicology levels. These are potentially fatal on dosage. Not resistance. Hence there is the breathalyser. Also drugs tests. You can't drive when under the influence. What killed the drunk in a car crash. Being drunk did. Dumbass.
That fucking idiot so professional in that courtroom has no argument when he is on the sauce. It is his argument. But immunity. Hick.
What symptoms has Floyd showed that are common when dying of a drug overdose?
Please enlighten us.
Nobody should care about this sideshow George Floyd nonsense. Horse and pony show