Antimatter Slowed With Laser Light: NASA astronomer Dr. Tom Van Flandern speculated that the asteroid belt is the remains of an exploded planet. Why is this significant? There are no known NATURALLY occurring examples of such anti-matter accumulation able to produce such an explosion. - Conspiracies

Antimatter Slowed With Laser Light: NASA astronomer Dr. Tom Van Flandern speculated that the asteroid belt is the remains of an exploded planet. Why is this significant? There are no known NATURALLY occurring examples of such anti-matter accumulation able to produce such an explosion. (gizadeathstar.com)

posted 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl +15 / -0

3 comments

3 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (3)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– MO-Carpenter 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Kinda seems like the extra planet part was shoehorned in at the end. Like the antimatter stuff is interesting but like also seemingly a far fetched guess to take the antimatter stuff and say a planet blew up and that’s why we have this asteroid belt. Maybe a planet got blown up, but maybe not antimatter. Also we think there still is planet(s)? in the Kuiper Belt. And we get asteroids and comets from it too that are seemingly not antimatter. Did it all explode? Seems clunky but I love exoplanet shit.

permalink save report block reply