Did you know that vaccines eradicated small pox?
Or did they?
Did you know, that the entire concept of vaccination, came from an ancient Chinese practice called variolation,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variolation
And wouldn't you know it, the Chinese were trying to "prevent" smallpox (of all things), by deliberately exposing people to smallpox.
The quackery caused far more problems than it solved, and was eventually abandoned,
But this ancient Chinese variolation quackery, then evolved into modern vaccine quackery.
In Leicester England, they tried to "prevent" smallpox, (off all things), by deliberately exposing people to smallpox.
The quackery caused far more problems than it solved, and was eventually abandoned.
The US Army deliberately gave smallpox infested blankets to Native Americans, deliberately exposing people to smallpox.
The quackery caused far more problems than it solved, and was eventually abandoned.
So, after thousands of years of using smallpox as a biological weapon,
Why should we see smallpox as anything other than a biological weapon in 2021?
Smallpox was spread deliberately, under the guise of "helping" people.
It was true in ancient China, it was true in medieval Europe, and its true in modern America.
They claim that smallpox was eradicated by the smallpox vaccine,
But the truth is, they have merely, temporarily refrained from deliberately spreading smallpox.
They keep some smallpox on-hand, in a lab, "for science"...
Sounds like a movie script?
The US Government weaponized Anthrax... "for science"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_anthrax_attacks
The claim that any disease is able to be eradicated by vaccines, should be viewed with skepticism.
They claim they were able to eradicate smallpox (and Rinderpest, a livestock disease) with vaccines.
Thats a total of TWO diseases, out of potentially millions of diseases, that they have been "successful in eradicating".
But how is that even possible to eradicate smallpox with a vaccine, if "anti-vaxxers" refuse the smallpox vaccine?
They claim that the reason they can't eradicate more diseases, is because anti-vaxxers refuse the vaccines,
And yet, we are to believe that these same "anti-vaxxers", who refuse every other vaccine, actually took the smallpox vaccine?
Got Polio?
What is polio? What causes polio? How can we prevent Polio?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rrb1XwI2_JA
"Polio" is a generic, umbrella term that is used to describe several different diseases.
"Polio" was not eradicated by vaccines, but rather by re-defining it out of existence.
Basically, "polio" are feces-borne germs, that you can get by touching a faucet handle after someone with polio, who got feces on their hands while wiping their butt, and then tried to wash it off in the sink.
How do you prevent polio? identify all of the different ways that you could come in contact with other peoples feces, and take corrective actions.
Wash your hands, but also wash the toilet flush handle, the sink faucet, and door handles, and light switches, and anywhere else someone with feces on their hands might touch...
And because of many years of modern plumbing, and sanitation practices, we are now able to keep polio down,
Or at least call it something else, so it appears to be going down.
Today, most of the cases of "polio" are caused by the polio-vaccine,
And they are called "vaccine-derived polio",
https://i.redd.it/aonk2gz844j11.png
And of course, instead of accepting any blame for the fact that the Polio epidemic is man-made,
The vaccine cult blames those who refuse the polio vaccine, for the fact that the polio vaccine spreads polio...
Very good work, thank you.
Great post. Nice to add the polio information, in particular, to my knowledge base
and do not forget that MS is so close to Polio.
Women working causes most cases of autism.
STUDY, noun - "to set the thought or mind"
SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio.] - "to know".
Could it be that both these terms represent the conscious function of ONEself, so wouldn't that be contradicted by believing the studies of science as offered by others? Could this be a suggestion used by others to trick ONE to consent to ignore ONEself?
The key is comprehension for self (through inspiration); instead of believing others (through offered information).