What they're doing is deliberately offering contradictions to reason (the conflict between believing in truth or false). Reason is in ignorance of reality (beliefs restrict ones comprehension of reality). Reality operates on implication (if/then), because reality is defined by motion (not time aka three affixed states of measuring motion).
Motion represents constant change (reality); belief represents affixed assumption in ignorance of motion (fiction). What you point out is called talmudic reasoning (controlling conflicts of reason through the suggestion of contradiction to keep the conflicts going). Meanwhile the talmud teaches to utilize implication (if/then); not reason (truth vs false).
How stupid can we be?
STUPID, adjective [Latin, to be stupefied, properly "to stop"). ALL is within motion; ONE has the choice to ignore motion, which "stops" ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived information within motion.
Stupid refers to ONE stopping by free will of choice to adapt to inspiration within ALL motion.
What they're doing is deliberately offering contradictions to reason (the conflict between believing in truth or false). Reason is in ignorance of reality (beliefs restrict ones comprehension of reality). Reality operates on implication (if/then), because reality is defined by motion (not time aka three affixed states of measuring motion).
Motion represents constant change (reality); belief represents affixed assumption in ignorance of motion (fiction). What you point out is called talmudic reasoning (controlling conflicts of reason through the suggestion of contradiction to keep the conflicts going). Meanwhile the talmud teaches to utilize implication (if/then); not reason (truth vs false).
STUPID, adjective [Latin, to be stupefied, properly "to stop"). ALL is within motion; ONE has the choice to ignore motion, which "stops" ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived information within motion.
Stupid refers to ONE stopping by free will of choice to adapt to inspiration within ALL motion.