Go take a look at voter data. Remove women's votes from the equation. See what kind of results you get. Literally every single shitty political movement is primarily supported by women. Democrats would never win again if women's votes were taken out of the equation.
This is also easily explained by biology and the evolutionary history of women.
Name a shitty political movement. BLM, Feminism, fat positivity, Intersectionalism, the tranny movement, etc. You can literally just list them off, and they are all primarily supported by women.
You're not even actually considering whether what I'm saying is true and thinking about it. You are just automatically defending women. Which is what most people do, whether left or right.
They are supported by corporations to foster division. Such as the division of man versus woman. Can you imagine convincing a rational adult male to go against their spouse? That's just crazy that any rational man would fall for such. Because men are smart. Am I right fam?
I agree that division between men and women is being fostered, but it's not what this is about. This isn't going against women. It's acknowledging women's evolutionary history, and their biology.
Women advocate for themselves. They advocate for taking resources from men and giving it to themselves. It makes a lot of sense why when you consider the evolutionary history of the sexes. Women needed to do so, because that was how they secured resources for their offspring.
They had to have very strong traits for this because there were lots of things stacked against them. Men were more competent, and also much stronger. In modern society, nothing tempers women's imperative to take resources from men. They no longer have to fear anything from men because of how civilization is set up.
They also don't have any responsibility to worry about either. If a woman decides to have a kid with some random loser, or she behaves terribly and is a terrible wife and partner, the government takes money from men by force and gives it to her. Not even just from the man who is the father of her children, but from all men through taxes. What incentive does a woman have to temper her inclination to advocate for herself? Absolutely none. All of women's bad behaviors and negative biological traits have nothing inhibiting them anymore. There is no incentive for a woman to be realistic or treat men nicely. Couple that with the fact that they innately do not have a problem with taking resources from men, and you have a big problem. The women in evolutionary history who had a problem with taking resources from men or just advocating for themselves did not have as successful offspring, so through the process of natural selection, the genes for endless advocacy are what flourished.
The biggest problem in my opinion is that no matter which side of the aisle, nobody likes these biological facts. They just pretend things aren't this way because acknowledging it makes them feel badly.
Go take a look at voter data. Remove women's votes from the equation. See what kind of results you get. Literally every single shitty political movement is primarily supported by women. Democrats would never win again if women's votes were taken out of the equation.
This is also easily explained by biology and the evolutionary history of women.
Again, ignoring voter fraud, pretending that the DNC are actual Democrats, ignoring the RINOs, and assuming psyops aren't used on men.
Speaking of which. Nice thread.
As vague and meaningless as reading tea leaves or my horoscope. Makes it so the data can mean anything I wish, as long as I believe. Womp, womp...
Name a shitty political movement. BLM, Feminism, fat positivity, Intersectionalism, the tranny movement, etc. You can literally just list them off, and they are all primarily supported by women.
You're not even actually considering whether what I'm saying is true and thinking about it. You are just automatically defending women. Which is what most people do, whether left or right.
They are supported by corporations to foster division. Such as the division of man versus woman. Can you imagine convincing a rational adult male to go against their spouse? That's just crazy that any rational man would fall for such. Because men are smart. Am I right fam?
I agree that division between men and women is being fostered, but it's not what this is about. This isn't going against women. It's acknowledging women's evolutionary history, and their biology.
Women advocate for themselves. They advocate for taking resources from men and giving it to themselves. It makes a lot of sense why when you consider the evolutionary history of the sexes. Women needed to do so, because that was how they secured resources for their offspring.
They had to have very strong traits for this because there were lots of things stacked against them. Men were more competent, and also much stronger. In modern society, nothing tempers women's imperative to take resources from men. They no longer have to fear anything from men because of how civilization is set up.
They also don't have any responsibility to worry about either. If a woman decides to have a kid with some random loser, or she behaves terribly and is a terrible wife and partner, the government takes money from men by force and gives it to her. Not even just from the man who is the father of her children, but from all men through taxes. What incentive does a woman have to temper her inclination to advocate for herself? Absolutely none. All of women's bad behaviors and negative biological traits have nothing inhibiting them anymore. There is no incentive for a woman to be realistic or treat men nicely. Couple that with the fact that they innately do not have a problem with taking resources from men, and you have a big problem. The women in evolutionary history who had a problem with taking resources from men or just advocating for themselves did not have as successful offspring, so through the process of natural selection, the genes for endless advocacy are what flourished.
The biggest problem in my opinion is that no matter which side of the aisle, nobody likes these biological facts. They just pretend things aren't this way because acknowledging it makes them feel badly.