A pissed on breadcrumb offered to those who consent to it as a contradiction to keep reasoning going (conflict between truth versus false). Instead of running to whichever side of the slave-pen (truth or false); try to apply if/then to the act of consenting to a pissed on breadcrumb to avoid the taste of piss, because no matter which side you nibble on; you already consented to a deliberate corruption.
Use implication over reason to comprehend that one doesn't have to reason (consent to conflict) if one comprehends the implication of outcome before consenting to it.
A pissed on breadcrumb offered to those who consent to it as a contradiction to keep reasoning going (conflict between truth versus false). Instead of running to whichever side of the slave-pen (truth or false); try to apply if/then to the act of consenting to a pissed on breadcrumb to avoid the taste of piss, because no matter which side you nibble on; you already consented to a deliberate corruption.
Use implication over reason to comprehend that one doesn't have to reason (consent to conflict) if one comprehends the implication of outcome before consenting to it.