Serious question here, for anyone that wants to answer.
I understand there's no evidence yet that the vaccine (or whatever you want to call it, let's not get hung up on the term) reduces symptoms and in general makes Covid less deadly.
That being said, if the symptoms are reduced, such as coughing, sneezing, leaking, would you not then be LESS LIKELY to cough the virus onto everyone?
In this scenario, while it doesn't prevent transmission, it does lower it.
So the question is, does what I typed not make sense?
It's a fair argument.
The counter argument would be:
Person gets the shot, they get covid, but they are less aware of it it since their immune system is trained on the spike protein and deals with it more efficiently.
They fail to stay isolated in an underground facility with 17 masks on at all times and become a super spreader.
'Muh asymptomatic spread'.
The whole thing is rendered useless because like u/nc777 pointed out the whole "asymptomatic" thing means that anyone and everyone can have it at any time without ever knowing, and because of that it's so easy to spread and hence all the masks and blah blah.
Who cares if symptoms are reduced when you're being told that you've already spread it and killed countless grandmas because you didn't wear a mask? Like what fucking difference does it make if you're aware of if you have it or not?
Asymptomatic. It's just the magic wand that covid needs to justify any draconian measure that's implemented. We all have to act like everyone already has it anyways, vaccine or not. The whole thing is just so retarded.
Another thing is "leaky vaccine" where those who have the vaccine and get COVID end up passing along a stronger, more deadly virus. To the point where if you want to survive you need the vaccine. Still too early to know if "leaky vaccine" will be a thing.
Serious question here, for anyone that wants to answer.
I understand there's no evidence yet that the vaccine (or whatever you want to call it, let's not get hung up on the term) reduces symptoms and in general makes Covid less deadly.
That being said, if the symptoms are reduced, such as coughing, sneezing, leaking, would you not then be LESS LIKELY to cough the virus onto everyone?
In this scenario, while it doesn't prevent transmission, it does lower it.
So the question is, does what I typed not make sense?
It's a fair argument.
The counter argument would be:
Person gets the shot, they get covid, but they are less aware of it it since their immune system is trained on the spike protein and deals with it more efficiently.
They fail to stay isolated in an underground facility with 17 masks on at all times and become a super spreader.
'Muh asymptomatic spread'.
Only if they dont vote Democrat
The whole thing is rendered useless because like u/nc777 pointed out the whole "asymptomatic" thing means that anyone and everyone can have it at any time without ever knowing, and because of that it's so easy to spread and hence all the masks and blah blah.
Who cares if symptoms are reduced when you're being told that you've already spread it and killed countless grandmas because you didn't wear a mask? Like what fucking difference does it make if you're aware of if you have it or not?
Asymptomatic. It's just the magic wand that covid needs to justify any draconian measure that's implemented. We all have to act like everyone already has it anyways, vaccine or not. The whole thing is just so retarded.
Another thing is "leaky vaccine" where those who have the vaccine and get COVID end up passing along a stronger, more deadly virus. To the point where if you want to survive you need the vaccine. Still too early to know if "leaky vaccine" will be a thing.