Welcome to the inaugural Round Table discussion on conspiracies.win!
Since /r/conspiracy appears sadly disinterested in continuing the Round Table tradition, it's up to us to keep it alive!
Thanks to u/Esuomyonana for the winning suggestion:
Let's do Jesuit stuff, I can't tell if it's Zionists or them?
The Mandalay Bay event was a very close second just in case anyone wants to add anything about that:
I would like to know more about the Mandalay Bay distraction and attempted assasination of MBS/DJT.
Basks are often Muslims dating back to when the Iberian peninsula was conquered by the Moores. It was primarily Catholics that came up with the fake religion of Islam, so no surprise he would be a Jesuit priest.
I'd heard Islam dated back to poorly translated Christian tracts into Syriac (which is related enough to standard Arabic to be mostly, but not completely intelligible) somewhere around the 6-8th century, and took on its modern form as competing leaders wrote texts documenting "Mohammed's" life both to justify their sovereignty and whatever perversions they wanted to entertain that week. "Mohammed" was originally the title the Koran used for Jesus, since it just means something along the lines of "he is deserving of praise." The false prophet was invented from whole cloth, according to my understanding.
He seems real enough but the religion attributed to him is a fake. Notice the parallels with mormonism. Both are based on information handed down from angels.
I disagree. I'd recommend reading the book "Did Mohammed Exist?" by Robert Spencer. He presents a fairly convincing argument there's no historical evidence for the existence of Mohammed.
I had not heard that. Perhaps he was a composite. The whole thing is fake so why not Muhammad too?