The Conspiracy Against Satoshi Nakamoto and The World
- SN wrote to two mailing lists before releasing BC. The "Cryptography" list and the "Cypherpunks" list. Why are there zero emails from the latter?
- Hal Finney wrote in his deathbed last email that after initially installing bitcoin in Jan 2009 he forgot all about it until 2010, yet there exists a lot of correspondence between HF and SN during that time. Why? Insiders say this is because HF let SN use a shell account on HF's server and the passwords to HF's email accounts and vice versus.
- Was bitcoin announced Aug 22nd 2008, Oct. 31st 2008 or Jan 3rd 2009 or Jan 11th 2009? Or was discussed in mailing lists before any of those dates?
- How many versions of the bitcoin white paper have you seen? Insiders say the original was in ASCII and the subsequent PDFs had version numbers.
- What happened to the original Sourceforge mailing lists, forums and code repos? Edit: the sourceforge project has suddenly returned!! Not seeing any forums though.
- Are there mysterious deaths surrounding SN?
- Why didn't anyone think to put SN's correspondence or the bitcoin white paper on the blockchain. If SN did, what happened to it?
- Did the Bilderberg Group purchase the "Blockchain" company? What else do you need to know to understand SN may be in danger?
- Re. Craig Wright. SN claimed nothing, but gave away his ideas to the public domain, anonymously. Does that sound like CW?
- If SN was in danger what would it look like? Email/date alterations. Deletions. Coverups. Censorship. Did that happen?
- SN mentioned microtransactions for things as minute as viewing a web page. He mentioned future exchanges would be willing to process "free transactions". He mentioned bitcoin being the end to fiat inflationary bubbles. What happened? Bitcoin was supposed to save humanity but it currently looks like a worst case scenario for income disparity. Sound like Bilderberg to you?
- If SN was in danger; his writings lost, trusted friends compromised or dead, his comms monitored and manipulated, what should be do? What org could he turn to for help?
Ask me questions if you like. I know people who may have answers.
I'll give you my take: The blockchain was supposed to be able to store arbitrary data. It was supposed to make money from transaction fees. Transaction fees were suppose to be set by the people doing the transaction, and/or the owner of the block/bitcoin. For example: I could take a bitcoin hash and split it up into tiny partitions, then use them for arbitrary commerce, such as streaming a video. I could say you must pay $0.25 to stream this 500MB video, this allowing bitcoin users to host their indy media and pay for the bandwidth, without any Credit Card company, bank, CDN, or gov't being able to interfere. That's why Satoshi was all happy about expanding the size of the comment input box, which took up the majority of the space on the original UI. You could also attach arbitrary files, such as pdfs, through the menu drop-down. Now then, how was that supposed to happen in the beginning when bitcoins themselves were worthless?
Answer: I can take my little piece of a bitcoin and operate my own merkle branch, and replicate it as I see fit, putting whatever the hell I want as data in the chain, for example: deductions from my website user's loaded funds of USD the added to their account using a credit card. Then at the end of the day, I can insert a compressed representation of this arbitrary data structure I created for my specific use case and needs and then insert it into the blockchain permanently. The owner of whatever coin/block I wish to put my data, can for example, charge by the Byte, a transaction fee. He can extract his payment and leave some remaining which get consolidated up the tree in temporal succession. Thus encouraging other nodes to incorporate that arbitrarily sized data. Nodes can be incentivized to grab the data/transaction quickly by being given a larger share of the associated fee residuals. Nodes could even charge requesters to host and transmit old data blocks. The possibilities are endless, but bitcoin seems very narrow in scope for some reason.
I don't know why, but I've seen it said that bitcoin has high minimum transaction fees. $5? $26? If so, why then did some vers of the whitepaper say "There will always be exchanges willing to process transactions for free."? Always?? Satoshi was pretty sure of what was supposed to happen. Something really weird is going on, IMHO.
Side note: I read that the sequentially versioned bitcoin whitepaper used to be included in the program releases. Along with a change log that contained the entire changelog history. Some docs explaining coding style, the versioning definition, and lots of comments. I don't understand how that info could be disappeared from the entire internet's memory.
Can anyone else confirm that the bitcoin sourceforge was non-existent a few months ago both at soueceforge and archive.org? I know, I searched archive.org. Nothing was there. But it's there now, except for the version control repo and the comms in the forums.... So, who is able to alter archive.org? Isn't that a big deal?
I saw different versions of the white paper. Some mention usenet and newspapers. Some mention this weird Byzantine Generals thing. I saw one that talked about "we need a way to send money that cannot be reversed. No matter how good the argument. No matter what.". Can anyone confirm or explain?
It's been getting harder and harder to find these other versions. I also saw a "Bitcoin ebook" that was published to elaborate on the white paper. Can't find the doc anywhere. But I know people with printouts.
I wish there were more people interested in historical preservation. I find it intriguing.