i believe in all sorts of "conspiracy theories", this is the only topic i ever get shitty with people about.
my last post before this shitpile was about impossible meats sourcing heme to make their "burgers" look/taste like real meat... from planned parenthood.
so i'm not exactly some sceptic dickbag here to shit on everything.
i've only ever bashed controlled demo assholes because it pisses me off that you all fell for such blatant bullshit. I've been in blasting, demo, and pyrotechnics my entire life... i know what it takes to bring a building like that down and there is no way in hell it can be done "covertly".
it takes months of gutting a building to get to it's structure to begin placing the charges and running the thousands of miles of blasting wire and/or det cord to initiate the blast.
all of that would have been very noticeable to the thousands of people who worked there everyday.
by the time you get done wiring a big building like this, the bundle of wires coming down the stairs is so big you can't wrap your arms around it.
and nobody saw anything?
not to mention that slamming planes into a building that has been prepped for demo would only cause the wires to be cut and the demo to fail...
THERE ARE LEGIT QUESTIONS TO BE ASKED ABOUT 9/11 and all anyone wants to talk about is something that is literally impossible and laughable.
don't you think it's more possible that the controlled demo theory was inserted into the conversation intentionally to make all other questioning of any conspiracies on 9/11 get lumped in along with the crazy bullshit they invented?
who funded the attack, who planned it, who looked the other way when they were getting tips about the flight school in florida, how is it that they just happen to have this patriot act chillin in a drawer ready to go soon after 9/11 happened.
all legit questions.
but you spergtards only want to talk about gravity defying thermite paint and missiles hitting the pentagon.
it's fucking infuriating how easily ya'll got manipulated.
all three building collapses started at their impact zones.
the two towers began collapsing at the plane impact zones, building 7 began collapsing at the base where one of the towers had collapsed into it and gouged a giant chunk out of the side.
all three buildings failed from the same reasons, there was a large damaged area that was set on fire, that damaged area was being required to carry the weight of the undamaged building above it, as the fires burned the metal softened until the damaged area was no longer able to hold that weight... and then the damaged area failed.
when this happened in the towers the upper undamaged sections crashed through the damaged area into the undamaged area below the impact zones and destroyed the buildings
in wtc 7 the lower floors failed and the upper building fell into it.
the reasons the buildings fell and how they behaved as they did fits perfectly with everything we know about physics and engineering.
thats not the shady stuff
everything leading up to that day should be questioned, how were these people able to pull this off with NOBODY seeming to know it was happening despite getting warnings from other intel agencies that this was coming.
IMO they let it happen... because they funded it.
Also it's quite obvious to me the 4th plane was shot down over PA, the entire "let's roll" story seems like complete bullshit to me. they already had 3 plane impacts with a 4th plane that turned out around over lake erie headed back twords DC... there's zero chance in hell they didn't take that plane down ANG was already up and hauling ass by the time it turned around (frankly we're lucky it didn't hit the nuke plant near toledo it turned around right over it). Faced witht he choice to let a 4th plane smash into the white house, or, shoot down a plane full of innocent civilians out over a farmers field in PA... they chose option B.
all of these things would be a lot of fun to talk about, but sadly we can't have discussions about this stuff, because anytime i try the person i'm talking to just rolls their eyes thinking i think that someone somehow planted explosives in the towers.
this is why this particular conspiracy theory pisses me off so much. it destroys all legit questioning of the event in the minds of normal rational thinking people and makes all of us who do question these things look insane and not worth engaging with.
Bruh, name 1 conspiracy theory that you do believe in. All you do is shit on ppl. lmao
i believe in all sorts of "conspiracy theories", this is the only topic i ever get shitty with people about.
my last post before this shitpile was about impossible meats sourcing heme to make their "burgers" look/taste like real meat... from planned parenthood.
so i'm not exactly some sceptic dickbag here to shit on everything.
i've only ever bashed controlled demo assholes because it pisses me off that you all fell for such blatant bullshit. I've been in blasting, demo, and pyrotechnics my entire life... i know what it takes to bring a building like that down and there is no way in hell it can be done "covertly".
it takes months of gutting a building to get to it's structure to begin placing the charges and running the thousands of miles of blasting wire and/or det cord to initiate the blast.
all of that would have been very noticeable to the thousands of people who worked there everyday.
by the time you get done wiring a big building like this, the bundle of wires coming down the stairs is so big you can't wrap your arms around it.
and nobody saw anything?
not to mention that slamming planes into a building that has been prepped for demo would only cause the wires to be cut and the demo to fail...
THERE ARE LEGIT QUESTIONS TO BE ASKED ABOUT 9/11 and all anyone wants to talk about is something that is literally impossible and laughable.
don't you think it's more possible that the controlled demo theory was inserted into the conversation intentionally to make all other questioning of any conspiracies on 9/11 get lumped in along with the crazy bullshit they invented?
who funded the attack, who planned it, who looked the other way when they were getting tips about the flight school in florida, how is it that they just happen to have this patriot act chillin in a drawer ready to go soon after 9/11 happened.
all legit questions.
but you spergtards only want to talk about gravity defying thermite paint and missiles hitting the pentagon.
it's fucking infuriating how easily ya'll got manipulated.
I just don't see how a plane hitting a building near the top makes it collapse from the base.
And building 7 never even got hit with a plane.
I'm all for hearing any theories. Because the whole narrative makes 0 sense.
all three building collapses started at their impact zones.
the two towers began collapsing at the plane impact zones, building 7 began collapsing at the base where one of the towers had collapsed into it and gouged a giant chunk out of the side.
all three buildings failed from the same reasons, there was a large damaged area that was set on fire, that damaged area was being required to carry the weight of the undamaged building above it, as the fires burned the metal softened until the damaged area was no longer able to hold that weight... and then the damaged area failed.
when this happened in the towers the upper undamaged sections crashed through the damaged area into the undamaged area below the impact zones and destroyed the buildings
in wtc 7 the lower floors failed and the upper building fell into it.
the reasons the buildings fell and how they behaved as they did fits perfectly with everything we know about physics and engineering.
thats not the shady stuff
everything leading up to that day should be questioned, how were these people able to pull this off with NOBODY seeming to know it was happening despite getting warnings from other intel agencies that this was coming.
IMO they let it happen... because they funded it.
Also it's quite obvious to me the 4th plane was shot down over PA, the entire "let's roll" story seems like complete bullshit to me. they already had 3 plane impacts with a 4th plane that turned out around over lake erie headed back twords DC... there's zero chance in hell they didn't take that plane down ANG was already up and hauling ass by the time it turned around (frankly we're lucky it didn't hit the nuke plant near toledo it turned around right over it). Faced witht he choice to let a 4th plane smash into the white house, or, shoot down a plane full of innocent civilians out over a farmers field in PA... they chose option B.
all of these things would be a lot of fun to talk about, but sadly we can't have discussions about this stuff, because anytime i try the person i'm talking to just rolls their eyes thinking i think that someone somehow planted explosives in the towers.
this is why this particular conspiracy theory pisses me off so much. it destroys all legit questioning of the event in the minds of normal rational thinking people and makes all of us who do question these things look insane and not worth engaging with.