Like I said, dude. You really don't seem to understand how the burden of proof works. It's your responsibility to prove to me that Hunter Biden is a pedophile. Can you prove it?
We have the evidence. You're crying it's "fake news!". If you cannot prove it than you're admitting you're a cocksucking little weasel bitch who can only cry "fake news!"
I understand just fine. You claim the evidence is "fake news" without anything to support it. Why are you making claims without evidence?
Why are you calling msnbc liars? How dare you. How very dare you.
So prove its "artifacted"
Lemme guess. "Russia!!!!!!!!!?????!!!!11!1!!!!!1!1!1!1!!"
I don't have to. I'm not the one making that claim. You're making claims of "artifacts", so prove it.
Do you know what an artifacted jpeg is, retard?
I'm the Indiana Jones of artifacts in pictures, faggot. The question is can you prove it. Yes or no? The answer is obviously no. Fuck off.
Like I said, dude. You really don't seem to understand how the burden of proof works. It's your responsibility to prove to me that Hunter Biden is a pedophile. Can you prove it?
We have the evidence. You're crying it's "fake news!". If you cannot prove it than you're admitting you're a cocksucking little weasel bitch who can only cry "fake news!"