Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

14
Man Tests Positive For COVID Three Weeks After Second Vaccine Dose (www.infowars.com)
posted 4 years ago by dukey 4 years ago by dukey +14 / -0
8 comments share
8 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (8)
sorted by:
▲ 3 ▼
– dukey [S] 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

At least the vaccine didn't kill him ?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Vigilo 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

...yet.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– NotAPengali 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Exactly. Yet.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– HUNDO 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

The vaccine does not prevent the spread or transmission of the virus. It is only "95% effective" at making your body's immune response milder. And sometimes kills the patient.

Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine do prevent the virus from binding to receptors which would effectively prevent transmission of the virus. Very safe and affordable preventative measure. Cant make a ton of money off of it though.. which is where the problem lies.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Vigilo 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

It's not even "95% effective" at making your symptoms milder. It's actually around 1% when you take their data and perform an absolute risk reduction. Pfizer's 162 'cases' in their control group of 18,325 participants and 8 'cases' in their vaccinated group of 18,198 participants. Reducing your symptoms from the control to the vaccinated group is analogous to (162/18,325 - 8/18,198)*100 = 0.84%

Pfizer's lie of 95% efficacy comes from a relative risk reduction analogous to 162 'cases' in the control over the total number of cases in both the control and vaccinated group or 170 'cases'. 162/170= 95.3%

Anybody with basis statistical analysis understanding will realize that reporting vaccine efficacy as relative risk reduction is meaningless because it ignores the sample size of both the control and vaccinated cohorts. Moderna follows the same methodology. Both are lies. Besides, no one would take a vaccine with 1% chance of reducing symptoms so they manipulate data.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– HUNDO 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Ah I remember reading about this! How could I forget. Thanks! So the odds of it lessening symptom severity is less than the odds of adverse reactions.. let me off this ride..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– newaka 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

the tesing doesn't work. Fruit has tested positive for covid

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– 19_tacocat_91 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

The vaccine doesn't prevent getting the disease, just makes the "symptoms" milder. :/

permalink save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy