Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

28
Has someone a valid explanation for this? (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 4 years ago by penisse 4 years ago by penisse +37 / -9
96 comments download share
96 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (96)
sorted by:
▲ -4 ▼
– ZyklonBen -4 points 4 years ago +6 / -10

Hey, what's that?

Why, its the boot that goes over the shoes.

Any retard with access to google could have found out in 30 seconds.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– Heckles -1 points 4 years ago +3 / -4

Yo, are you stupid enough to believe the Apollo missions landed on the moon? Are you actually saying that? I think reddit is more your area.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– stagolee 0 points 4 years ago +2 / -2

He’s not saying the moon landing is confirmed, he’s saying this stupid ass post doesn’t prove anything. Learn the difference, retard.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -1 ▼
– deleted -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2
▲ 1 ▼
– stagolee 1 point 4 years ago +2 / -1

What the fuck are you talking about? All he did was post a link about the boots. That doesn’t mean he thinks the whole thing is confirmed, only that it’s reasonable that the boots didn’t match. You are an example of our failed education system. Learn to think critically.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ -1 ▼
– ZyklonBen -1 points 4 years ago +1 / -2

How did they fake the parabolic arcs of the moon dust that was stirred up by the astronauts walking on the moon?

Before you answer: do you actually know what I am talking about?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Heckles 2 points 4 years ago +3 / -1

Do I know what you're talking about is a funny question, when you don't even seem to know what you're talking about. The evidence that you are referring to is that the moon dust supposedly DIDN'T fall in a parabolic arc, because parabolic arcs are what happen here on earth. So you asking how they faked a parabolic arc, is gibberish.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and answer the question I assume you thought you were asking; Why DIDN'T the dust kicked up by the rover fall in a parabolic arc?

The answer to that is simple, we have a tiny amount of footage that shows this and the way the dust falls is hardly conclusive, many scientists still debate it. We also have testimony from astronauts who were supposedly there that contradict the dust NOT falling in a parabolic arc:

Apollo astronaut Charlie Duke did say, while describing what it was like to ride in the lunar rover, that “Moon dust was pouring down on us like rain, and so after a half of a Moon walk, our white suits turned gray.”

This contradicts your story that the dust DIDN'T fall in a parabolic arc, and in fact was kicked up into clouds that poured down on them.

Thanks for playing, try again.

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy