Again, you don't understand how the argument works. The burden of proof is not on me to prove the non-existence of something. It's on you to prove the opposite. The Sabbateans were a specific sect of Messianic Jews led by Sabbatai Zevi, later co-opted by Jacob Frank. Both of these men died, both were definitively proved not to be the Messiah. Without the figurehead, there's no reason for the sect to continue.
If you can find people out there who still believe that one of these men from hundreds of years ago is the Messiah, then more power to you. They don't exist.
You're talking about something that died out by the end of the 1700s.
Again, you don't understand how the argument works. The burden of proof is not on me to prove the non-existence of something. It's on you to prove the opposite. The Sabbateans were a specific sect of Messianic Jews led by Sabbatai Zevi, later co-opted by Jacob Frank. Both of these men died, both were definitively proved not to be the Messiah. Without the figurehead, there's no reason for the sect to continue.
If you can find people out there who still believe that one of these men from hundreds of years ago is the Messiah, then more power to you. They don't exist.
You're talking about something that died out by the end of the 1700s.
So why was Supreme Court justice Brandeis a Frankist then? And born from Frankists. Unless wikipedia is lying.
Or you are.
Oh no, I already know that.
He wasn't, his parents were.
Oh no, he was. His parents too.
So you willfully acknowledge you just lied about it, yes?
I just said that his parents were. He wasn't.