-
Yet, when Epstein ran a child prostitution/blackmail operation with the funding of Les Wexner and assistance of Ghislaine Maxwell, why didn't the MSM call it a Jewish conspiracy to commit espionage.
-
When Soros buys riots, politicians and illegal immigrant caravans, why doesn't the MSM call it a Jewish conspiracy to destroy democracy?
-
When Bloomberg buys politicians who are willing to support is progressive erosion of the Second Amendment, why isn't this labeled a Jewish conspiracy to disarm the public.
-
When Haim Saban openly calls for MSM censorship of the globalists' opponents, why isnt this called a Jewish conspiracy to promote censorship?
-
When Alan Greenspan deliberately created the credit bubble of 2008 to justify the subsequent bailouts,, why wasn't this described as a Jewish conspiracy to loot the Treasury?
-
When Ben Benanke oversaw the bailout proceeds being diverted into the coffers of the likes of Bloomberg, Steyer, Ellison, Soros, etc. who proceeded to use those funds to buy the subverted cesspool that we now have, why wasn't that called a Jewish conspiracy to destroy America.
-
When Israel blew up the WTC and "Lucky" Larry Silverstein made billions by frontrunning the attack, why wasn't this labeled as a Jewish conspiracy to commit blatant insurance fraud?
-
When Mark Zuckerberg was awarded the ownership of FB and proceeded to use it to censor any opposition to globalist scams, why didnt the MSM call this a Jewish conspiracy to stifle political speech?
It's almost as if there was a conspiracy amongstthe MSM/ownership to suppress the exposure of Jewish criminality.
Who cares? There are extremists in every group. Does David Duke speak for all “white people”? Does Osama Bin Laden speak for all Muslims?
I’m not talking about the thoughts or actions of a few disturbed individuals, I’m talking about ideology written into the holy books.
No, however thanks to Osama all muslim got treated like potential terrorist and it is fine, because he was one of leaders of fanatic nest of fanatic muslim vipers not only one terrorist. Probably not all jews are bad,but as long as they don't condemn and not fight jewish supremacists and jews supporting communism they shall as suspected of being ones of those like muslims are suspected of planning of terrorist attack or supporting it.Better safe than sorry.
As I said - if there wouldn't be such ideas in jewish holy books why the hell those rabbi would say such things ?
And about Talmud - huh,find one legitimate,that's the problem. There is Bible in internet - translated to all languages. Quran and it's comments in internet too - translations too. But when it comes to jewish Talmud - only parts are available translated in quite obfuscated versions and try to find one legitimate version... And as fair as I know probably teaching non-jews what is in Talmud might be somehow prohibited by jewish community and that's the reason. Why they hide it?
As fair as I know however:
One thing looks quite sure: Talmud is all about different rabbi's comments,so if at least some important rabbi say such things it has to be somehow important.
Nothing about the Talmud is hidden.
http://sefaria.org/
Wow. That was difficult, huh?
Well finding those webpage was not hard. 1.Except the fact comments are english but oryginal text look being kept hebrew 2.Except the fact that that there are other pages with it for example: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/babylonian-talmud-full-text and even comparing it is nightmare: https://www.sefaria.org/Eruvin.2a.1-14?lang=bi https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/tractate-eruvin-chapter-1
How I am supposed to verify even potential "iniciting violence" quotes claimed by "far right" in such case and verify context ? Checking Koran or Bible - no problem,but when it comes to those Jewish writtings trying to do such checks is nightmare.