-
Yet, when Epstein ran a child prostitution/blackmail operation with the funding of Les Wexner and assistance of Ghislaine Maxwell, why didn't the MSM call it a Jewish conspiracy to commit espionage.
-
When Soros buys riots, politicians and illegal immigrant caravans, why doesn't the MSM call it a Jewish conspiracy to destroy democracy?
-
When Bloomberg buys politicians who are willing to support is progressive erosion of the Second Amendment, why isn't this labeled a Jewish conspiracy to disarm the public.
-
When Haim Saban openly calls for MSM censorship of the globalists' opponents, why isnt this called a Jewish conspiracy to promote censorship?
-
When Alan Greenspan deliberately created the credit bubble of 2008 to justify the subsequent bailouts,, why wasn't this described as a Jewish conspiracy to loot the Treasury?
-
When Ben Benanke oversaw the bailout proceeds being diverted into the coffers of the likes of Bloomberg, Steyer, Ellison, Soros, etc. who proceeded to use those funds to buy the subverted cesspool that we now have, why wasn't that called a Jewish conspiracy to destroy America.
-
When Israel blew up the WTC and "Lucky" Larry Silverstein made billions by frontrunning the attack, why wasn't this labeled as a Jewish conspiracy to commit blatant insurance fraud?
-
When Mark Zuckerberg was awarded the ownership of FB and proceeded to use it to censor any opposition to globalist scams, why didnt the MSM call this a Jewish conspiracy to stifle political speech?
It's almost as if there was a conspiracy amongstthe MSM/ownership to suppress the exposure of Jewish criminality.
LOL, PM'ing me. Because you have to run away from the question. Priceless!
The thread had gone on too long and it wouldn’t let me reply to your comment. I’ll happily say here what I said there:
It’s doubtful that you’re asking the question in good faith. The Talmud isn’t some secret book filled with gentile hatred and child rape, so what a defunct sect of Jewish cultists thinks of it is pretty irrelevant to the topic at hand.
Now, do you have any insight whatsoever or are you just posting shit that you know nothing about? I’m guessing the latter.
So how can I ask the question "in good faith"? If they are "defunct", it really wouldn't matter now, would it? Why wouldn't you just say they're "defunct" to begin with?
Talk about "being coy".
Fear of what? Again, you don’t even know what you’re talking about. The Sabbateans didn’t have a particular relationship to the Talmud. They were more interested in the mystical elements of the Kabbalah, but there was no rejection of the former. If you’re trying to get me to discuss the anti-Talmudists, then you’d be talking about the Frankists.
Oh, I know exactly what I am talking about mate. That's why you didn't answer directly to begin with.
You didn’t have a point. You bizarrely tried to “get me” on something that I very clearly answered, then moved the goalposts multiple times to make yourself feel better.
You told me how Sabbateans view the Talmud?
No?
Oh, that's right, you didn't.
Do you think downvoting works here? LOL
WOW
I do have a point, and you still haven't answered yet, so why would I bring it up? If you can't answer a very, very simple question, why would I want to elaborate further?