The Supreme Court didn’t reject the measles case because it was a “faked image.” In this context, “composite nature of the evidence” refers to the challenger publishing six papers about the measles virus but he did not meet all of Lanka’s requirements in a single paper. That is why it is a “composite nature.”
For example, Lanka didn’t just want someone to prove the existence of measles, he also wanted the person to determine the size of it. The person challenging Lanka did all of those things but not in a single paper. It was spread throughout six papers.
I think viruses are BS, but I don't have a logical explanation for chicken pox or measles. Anyone have a theory as to what they are? They do cause a rash and appear to be contagious, but I never caught either even after being exposed to chicken pox.
Terrain theory definitely interests me. The only thing I wonder about are things like Columbian exchange diseases etc like smallpox which ravaged indigenous populations as soon as europeans arrived. Might there have been some toxin they carried which caused the virus I wonder?
No. Essentially, "germs" aren't the "cause" of disease. "Germs" (e.g. bacteria --- viruses aren't real) show up when your body's terrain has been damaged, injured, poisoned, malnourished, etc. The bacteria are there to clean up the mess, eat decaying tissue, remove poisons, etc.
"Germ Theory" should have been proven a long, long time ago - 1930s, 1940s timeframe. The fact that it's still a "theory" 90 years later means it's a failed theory.
Viruses aren't real. What they call viruses are just dead/decayed/disintegrated chunks of cells/tissue. Hence, by definition, viruses are pieces of DNA/RNA with a protein-covering. Which is exactly what pieces of dead cells would be.
There's no such thing as viruses. A rash would be caused by a toxin/poison or some other skin irritant. It can also be cause by psychosomatic issues. Research German New Medicine (GNM) for a better understanding of the real cause if illnesses in most cases.
Read "The Contagion Myth" to learn why this isn't the way things work.
Interesting post I'll have to give it a read
Here are the links from this post:
https://truth11.com/2020/12/14/terrain-theory-vs-germ-theory-rockefeller-boondoggle/
https://seedsofawareness.com.au/understanding-the-terrain-theory-of-disease/
Thank you for your service
The Supreme Court didn’t reject the measles case because it was a “faked image.” In this context, “composite nature of the evidence” refers to the challenger publishing six papers about the measles virus but he did not meet all of Lanka’s requirements in a single paper. That is why it is a “composite nature.”
For example, Lanka didn’t just want someone to prove the existence of measles, he also wanted the person to determine the size of it. The person challenging Lanka did all of those things but not in a single paper. It was spread throughout six papers.
Well then of course they put it all into one paper and claimed the prize, right?
I think viruses are BS, but I don't have a logical explanation for chicken pox or measles. Anyone have a theory as to what they are? They do cause a rash and appear to be contagious, but I never caught either even after being exposed to chicken pox.
Terrain theory definitely interests me. The only thing I wonder about are things like Columbian exchange diseases etc like smallpox which ravaged indigenous populations as soon as europeans arrived. Might there have been some toxin they carried which caused the virus I wonder?
And if any people on earth have damaged terrain, it is the fat American public.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/b5mmRRs6fxrH/
Is there a eli5 version because I don't get what each theory is.
Is it basically a theory that people cleaned themselves better and the disease was eliminate? Similar to why polio was eliminate.
No. Essentially, "germs" aren't the "cause" of disease. "Germs" (e.g. bacteria --- viruses aren't real) show up when your body's terrain has been damaged, injured, poisoned, malnourished, etc. The bacteria are there to clean up the mess, eat decaying tissue, remove poisons, etc.
"Germ Theory" should have been proven a long, long time ago - 1930s, 1940s timeframe. The fact that it's still a "theory" 90 years later means it's a failed theory.
Viruses aren't real. What they call viruses are just dead/decayed/disintegrated chunks of cells/tissue. Hence, by definition, viruses are pieces of DNA/RNA with a protein-covering. Which is exactly what pieces of dead cells would be.
Thank you for an excellent breakdown. What are your thoughts on "viruses" that cause rashes and are said to be contagious?
There's no such thing as viruses. A rash would be caused by a toxin/poison or some other skin irritant. It can also be cause by psychosomatic issues. Research German New Medicine (GNM) for a better understanding of the real cause if illnesses in most cases.
Read "The Contagion Myth" to learn why this isn't the way things work.
Is there a book or info to read on how to take care of your health if you "believe" in terrain theory?
Imagine no civilization existed. What would you do? Where would you be? What would you eat? The more natural your life, the healthier you'll be.