Typical of someone with the "Mark". I don't trust anyone that wants to use the mark even if they appear "based". If you model yourself after a being that wants to destroy mankind and deceive people then your motives and trustworthiness should always be suspect.
It's the handwritten signature of the priests that opposed Christ but otherwise isn't that significant or important. Yet most people that use it or talk about it thinks it has to do with the American urban legend of a one world ruler who would try to commit genocide. Or the user knows it symbolizes the enemy of mankind and uses it with that definition.
Either way there's no reason to trust someone who would support such things even if they will never happen.
Typical of someone with the "Mark". I don't trust anyone that wants to use the mark even if they appear "based". If you model yourself after a being that wants to destroy mankind and deceive people then your motives and trustworthiness should always be suspect.
666
It's the handwritten signature of the priests that opposed Christ but otherwise isn't that significant or important. Yet most people that use it or talk about it thinks it has to do with the American urban legend of a one world ruler who would try to commit genocide. Or the user knows it symbolizes the enemy of mankind and uses it with that definition.
Either way there's no reason to trust someone who would support such things even if they will never happen.