It is completely FALSE to say the concerns over the election "has been looked at in every single state." In fact, not a single state will publish the ballots (as promised by @GaSecofState) & not a single state will allow party-observers to independently confirm signature matches. - Conspiracies

It is completely FALSE to say the concerns over the election "has been looked at in every single state." In fact, not a single state will publish the ballots (as promised by @GaSecofState) & not a single state will allow party-observers to independently confirm signature matches. (nitter.net)

posted 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl 3 years ago by axolotl_peyotl +87 / -2

9 comments

9 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (9)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– Mad_King_Kalak 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

What's messed up about this, is that after the 2000 election, the press pooled their resources and a full hand recount was done in Florida, using very loose standards (remember the hanging chads) and it was done on purpose to say G. W. Bush's win was not legitimate. Now, the recounts showed he won, and that the Dems were prevented by a braver SCOTUS from recounting again and again until they got the results they wanted, but damn, Florida allowed for the recounts after the fact.

permalink save report block reply