The annoying shills have been getting bans, but a few seems to just come back over and over starting where they left, posting MSM articles trying to gas light us.
I think some of these people are just angry because of the media terrorizing them for the last 4 years. They are trying to get some kind of perceived revenge for their lives becoming emotional nightmares under Trump.
No. This is DARPA-net, and each and every one participant within is consenting to it. It's called the Internet; from IN'TER, a Latin preposition, signifying among or between; used as a prefix. They offer the net (NET, noun - a cunning device; a snare), and you consent to it with monthly payments; with participation, with believing what they tell you what it is etc.
Would a military industrial complex give up a vantage position to those they have a vantage over? The intent behind the net/web is deception (0 over 1 aka fiction over reality) and data accumulation.
What you perceive as legislation is them cleaning up their tracks afterwards by indoctrinating their subjects to consent to giving their data away. This is also what all those data-breaches; mass leaked email-addresses, wikleaks, the fappening, and the whole virus protection racket was about.
Control over another is always based on an offer towards consent, because ones free will of choice represents ones sole authority over self.
All the alphabet agencies you listed are also deceptions to cover tracks, as well as "farming" of subjects to utilize them to build the infrastructures that enslave them. This is an ongoing process for each new generation, which is why they need to destroy the past; exploit the present and corrupt the future.
Control through deception adheres to the cyclical nature of energy in motion. This is why they consolidate power to kill of the unneeded, after which they break the monopolies to reseed for the next cycle of rebuilding.
What never changes is the control structure behind it all (offer meets consent), which is what automatically establishes a "chain of command" based on blind faith towards false authority, which represents a self sustaining; world wide caste system, within which the selfish are destroying each other, while trying to climb to the top (which is obviously a pyramid; on top of which isn't any room for anyone other than the all seeing eye watching the whole thing build itself up, just to cascade back down).
I don't see anything in the TOS that says state actors are not allowed here. I do see a privacy policy, which you are threatening to violate, and I'm pretty sure your not very veiled threats of violence ("extralegal extrajudicial special operations") are not only violating the TOS, but the laws of most countries, and probably constitutes terrorism under US law..
I was literally removed as top mod of /r/conspiracy by the reddit brass less than 12 hours after a Senator complained about "reddit conspiracies" in Congress. If you don't see that as a vindication of my efforts then I can do nothing to help you.
You think shills are acting as individuals? No. Not even close.
The annoying shills have been getting bans, but a few seems to just come back over and over starting where they left, posting MSM articles trying to gas light us.
I think some of these people are just angry because of the media terrorizing them for the last 4 years. They are trying to get some kind of perceived revenge for their lives becoming emotional nightmares under Trump.
They come to YOUR platform to kick YOU off of it.
No. This is DARPA-net, and each and every one participant within is consenting to it. It's called the Internet; from IN'TER, a Latin preposition, signifying among or between; used as a prefix. They offer the net (NET, noun - a cunning device; a snare), and you consent to it with monthly payments; with participation, with believing what they tell you what it is etc.
Would a military industrial complex give up a vantage position to those they have a vantage over? The intent behind the net/web is deception (0 over 1 aka fiction over reality) and data accumulation.
What you perceive as legislation is them cleaning up their tracks afterwards by indoctrinating their subjects to consent to giving their data away. This is also what all those data-breaches; mass leaked email-addresses, wikleaks, the fappening, and the whole virus protection racket was about.
Control over another is always based on an offer towards consent, because ones free will of choice represents ones sole authority over self.
All the alphabet agencies you listed are also deceptions to cover tracks, as well as "farming" of subjects to utilize them to build the infrastructures that enslave them. This is an ongoing process for each new generation, which is why they need to destroy the past; exploit the present and corrupt the future.
Control through deception adheres to the cyclical nature of energy in motion. This is why they consolidate power to kill of the unneeded, after which they break the monopolies to reseed for the next cycle of rebuilding.
What never changes is the control structure behind it all (offer meets consent), which is what automatically establishes a "chain of command" based on blind faith towards false authority, which represents a self sustaining; world wide caste system, within which the selfish are destroying each other, while trying to climb to the top (which is obviously a pyramid; on top of which isn't any room for anyone other than the all seeing eye watching the whole thing build itself up, just to cascade back down).
I agree with this but the "capitalist" part is complete bullshit. A company being the public face of the NSA is absolutely not free market economics.
Thank you.
Just came here to say this.
We're on THEIR platform and they're taking notes. :) They're not on ours.
I don't see anything in the TOS that says state actors are not allowed here. I do see a privacy policy, which you are threatening to violate, and I'm pretty sure your not very veiled threats of violence ("extralegal extrajudicial special operations") are not only violating the TOS, but the laws of most countries, and probably constitutes terrorism under US law..
omg you glow so much lol
so do you lol. are you using a new skin cream, lol?
I was literally removed as top mod of /r/conspiracy by the reddit brass less than 12 hours after a Senator complained about "reddit conspiracies" in Congress. If you don't see that as a vindication of my efforts then I can do nothing to help you.
That's how they give undercover ops "street cred".