I've been a Apollo Moon landing hoaxer for a while, but I'm venturing outside my comfort zone a little here: what if the hoax is not that they didn't go, but that they went, yet lied about almost every aspect of the missions and what they encountered there?
I'm working my way through the youtube channel LunaCognita and it's blowing my mind. This guy shows many such crazy anomalies about the Apollo missions, but they are all predicated on the missions actually having occured successfully, just not in the way we've been presented.
The fakery others see in the Apollo footage (that I also see), he sees too, but interprets it differently and it's fascinating.
I don't know what he had to say about the many scientific impossibilites surrounding the missions as they were related to the public, but I guess I'm open to the possibility that the missions were largely achieved thanks to tech NASA posessed that they never even divulged...
You're coming to the same tentative conclusion I've reached. The moon missions were real, but they found weird stuff, so they had to fabricate stories to hide what they really found.
What got me on this path was the really strange presser that Armstrong and the others held when they returned. You could tell they were having a real hard time expressing themselves freely, and I there were a couple of moments where it looked like they weren't sure the "correct" thing to say.
To me, it looks like a bunch of guys sick to their stomachs about having to lie about the most amazing thing they or any human had ever done.
I know. I'm definitely not forgetting all that stuff.
Still some of the videos on that youtube channel I linked are compelling.
The only possible way the landings could have been real is for them to have used tons of secret, (for the time) astronomically advanced tech that they never revaled.
And for example, LunaCognita shows there is a classified mention of fibre optics that NASA was using... in the 60's.
To the public, fibre optics only came into semi-practical existence in the late 80's.
This is one of those "entertaining two contradictory narratives to see where it leads" moments for me.
classified mention of fibre optics that NASA was using... in the 60's.To the public, fibre optics only came into semi-practical existence in the late 80's.
Into declassified existence you probably say. Despite it is conspiracy sub I am not so "conspiracy theoreticist",but it looks obvious for me,that some technologies accessible for military (not only in USA) are on higher technological level than people are allowed to know,and of course military use some experimental technologies. It was also cold war so mentioning it in official science was meaning only that technology was declassified. Idea on which fiber optics were based was known in XIX century and in case of NASA moon project cost was NOT the issue,so using it 8 years after it was officially mentioned was not big thing.
You know - it is not conspiracy at all that there are military experiments and research with for example:
miniaturized atomic clocks as detectors of gravitational anomalies (bunkers,underground tunnels)
satellites using radar technologies for surveillance of buildings (this year officially prototype, was said about 0,5mx0,5m resolution)
drone swarms for military purposes
connecting with computer (and probably what is more sinister: controlling and altering) functions of human brain*
*this last might be however overestimated by conspiracy theorist community (unless you believe hidden technologies are more advanced and cheap to produce than it looks) if it is about injecting some neuralink-like shit with "vaccine" because raw nanotubes and similar products usually still cost more than gold in most cases (not to mention nanotechnology can be quite toxic,sometimes cancerogenic for the tissue). Neuralink is for now probably mostly still researching and for now it is as far I know officially concentrated on microarray electrode brain chip. Not so advanced interface if you check literature and rather not to control human brain (altering something a bit or blocking pain would be maybe the issue) ,however for sure allowing minor cyborgization for using exoskeletons, advanced prosthetics and minor vehicle control. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microelectrode_array
Simply - those things are becoming possible - and possible officially.
Just like the woman in the miniskirt never intended to drop that pencil...
James Corbett used that metaphor pertaining to the U.S government and UFO's/ aliens. They did everything they possibly could do to make us believe they're hiding the existence of aliens.
I've been a Apollo Moon landing hoaxer for a while, but I'm venturing outside my comfort zone a little here: what if the hoax is not that they didn't go, but that they went, yet lied about almost every aspect of the missions and what they encountered there?
I'm working my way through the youtube channel LunaCognita and it's blowing my mind. This guy shows many such crazy anomalies about the Apollo missions, but they are all predicated on the missions actually having occured successfully, just not in the way we've been presented.
The fakery others see in the Apollo footage (that I also see), he sees too, but interprets it differently and it's fascinating.
I don't know what he had to say about the many scientific impossibilites surrounding the missions as they were related to the public, but I guess I'm open to the possibility that the missions were largely achieved thanks to tech NASA posessed that they never even divulged...
Anyway, here's the channel:
https://www.youtube.com/user/LunaCognita/videos
Apparently this guy even went missing some years ago.
You're coming to the same tentative conclusion I've reached. The moon missions were real, but they found weird stuff, so they had to fabricate stories to hide what they really found.
What got me on this path was the really strange presser that Armstrong and the others held when they returned. You could tell they were having a real hard time expressing themselves freely, and I there were a couple of moments where it looked like they weren't sure the "correct" thing to say.
To me, it looks like a bunch of guys sick to their stomachs about having to lie about the most amazing thing they or any human had ever done.
Radiation too - could have fucked up all their photos.... made them grey and grainy.
Which makes me think this is a real photo!
The rest are entirely radiation free and clear.... reconstructions later?
You say he went missing and my brain immediately jumps to the conclusion that he faked his own death for safety from TPTB
What has happened to me...
And radiation screwing up all their photos! Grainy and grey....... oooooo - just like this possibly real moon photo!
All the perfectly un-radiated pictures from the moon?! Seems sus man.
I know. I'm definitely not forgetting all that stuff.
Still some of the videos on that youtube channel I linked are compelling.
The only possible way the landings could have been real is for them to have used tons of secret, (for the time) astronomically advanced tech that they never revaled.
And for example, LunaCognita shows there is a classified mention of fibre optics that NASA was using... in the 60's.
To the public, fibre optics only came into semi-practical existence in the late 80's.
This is one of those "entertaining two contradictory narratives to see where it leads" moments for me.
Into declassified existence you probably say. Despite it is conspiracy sub I am not so "conspiracy theoreticist",but it looks obvious for me,that some technologies accessible for military (not only in USA) are on higher technological level than people are allowed to know,and of course military use some experimental technologies. It was also cold war so mentioning it in official science was meaning only that technology was declassified. Idea on which fiber optics were based was known in XIX century and in case of NASA moon project cost was NOT the issue,so using it 8 years after it was officially mentioned was not big thing.
You know - it is not conspiracy at all that there are military experiments and research with for example:
*this last might be however overestimated by conspiracy theorist community (unless you believe hidden technologies are more advanced and cheap to produce than it looks) if it is about injecting some neuralink-like shit with "vaccine" because raw nanotubes and similar products usually still cost more than gold in most cases (not to mention nanotechnology can be quite toxic,sometimes cancerogenic for the tissue). Neuralink is for now probably mostly still researching and for now it is as far I know officially concentrated on microarray electrode brain chip. Not so advanced interface if you check literature and rather not to control human brain (altering something a bit or blocking pain would be maybe the issue) ,however for sure allowing minor cyborgization for using exoskeletons, advanced prosthetics and minor vehicle control. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microelectrode_array Simply - those things are becoming possible - and possible officially.
Just like the woman in the miniskirt never intended to drop that pencil...
James Corbett used that metaphor pertaining to the U.S government and UFO's/ aliens. They did everything they possibly could do to make us believe they're hiding the existence of aliens.
No they just filmed in on a set in egypt.