Who would you say are the firebrands if not Corbett? Yeah sure a lot of people say a lot more flagrant and seemingly controversial things than Corbett, but not too many people provide as much information and detail backing up the things they say - so not too many source the validity and likely truth of what they say as much as Corbett, so the information doesn't carry as much weight.
Not saying that Corbett is "the best" presenter. Of course not. There are many people providing a lot of info. However, who's information are you saying has more weight than Corbett's?
No, I agree his material is as good as anybody's on a site like Youtube, he's just not politically dangerous, so he's not as much of a censorship priority
Pizzagate and topics of murderous pedophilia are definitely "dangerous" to cover (i.e. they're topics that should most definitely be covered), but who/what would you say is politically dangerous if not any of the topics Corbett covers?
Who would you say are the firebrands if not Corbett? Yeah sure a lot of people say a lot more flagrant and seemingly controversial things than Corbett, but not too many people provide as much information and detail backing up the things they say - so not too many source the validity and likely truth of what they say as much as Corbett, so the information doesn't carry as much weight.
Not saying that Corbett is "the best" presenter. Of course not. There are many people providing a lot of info. However, who's information are you saying has more weight than Corbett's?
No, I agree his material is as good as anybody's on a site like Youtube, he's just not politically dangerous, so he's not as much of a censorship priority
Pizzagate and topics of murderous pedophilia are definitely "dangerous" to cover (i.e. they're topics that should most definitely be covered), but who/what would you say is politically dangerous if not any of the topics Corbett covers?
Hmm. Never heard of him. I'll look him up. Thanks.