No, I agree his material is as good as anybody's on a site like Youtube, he's just not politically dangerous, so he's not as much of a censorship priority
Pizzagate and topics of murderous pedophilia are definitely "dangerous" to cover (i.e. they're topics that should most definitely be covered), but who/what would you say is politically dangerous if not any of the topics Corbett covers?
No, I agree his material is as good as anybody's on a site like Youtube, he's just not politically dangerous, so he's not as much of a censorship priority
Pizzagate and topics of murderous pedophilia are definitely "dangerous" to cover (i.e. they're topics that should most definitely be covered), but who/what would you say is politically dangerous if not any of the topics Corbett covers?