I noticed that when some liberal person enumerate "opressed minorities", Native Americans will be omitted from the list. Even typical MSM articles omit them (f.e. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/23/politics/black-lives-matter-support-impact/index.html - just first article about BLM in search results)
AFAIK from history lessons, natives had much more issues with white people than blacks. Europeans come to their land as uninvited guests and just killed them taking their valuables and lands.
So why SJW omit natives? Is there something I don't know/understand?
I just don't know what you're implying. What's the relevance of leaving out natives? That SJWs are racist? We know that.
I'd asked a question to get more info. And some fellow *win'ners provided some. Isn't that one of the things the conspiracy.win exist for?
I did not know. Now I suppose that this is another good and solid proof of liberal hypocrisy.
I doubt that they are rasist. They don't care about race at all. This case with natives prove it too. They care only about gaining power and suppressing others at any cost and by any means.
I also see nothing bad in racism. It is completely normal to be proud of, protect and prefer your own race. That does not inevitably cause hate to other, as liberal shills try to convince you. Most people prefer and protect their own family over other people, without any hate to those around, so why that social things should be any different at larger scale? If you can't be proud of and do not care about your family you have no means and concepts to understand and respect others.
Well said.
Maybe the brutality of some tribes would justify what happened to them in people's minds. More of a legitimate war. Maybe they're just an afterthought as you say. I don't know.
What I do know is how to call someone a homosexual in native language. It's pronounced "knee clay".