I noticed that when some liberal person enumerate "opressed minorities", Native Americans will be omitted from the list. Even typical MSM articles omit them (f.e. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/23/politics/black-lives-matter-support-impact/index.html - just first article about BLM in search results)
AFAIK from history lessons, natives had much more issues with white people than blacks. Europeans come to their land as uninvited guests and just killed them taking their valuables and lands.
So why SJW omit natives? Is there something I don't know/understand?
They don't omit natives. Where do you think the dumb acronym "bipoc" comes from?
I rare meet that acronym over the net. Most use "poc" as "people who are not white", but enumeration of that "not whites" often omit natives.
I don't know where you get the notion that natives are "omitted" from anything. It's not like they're treated like asians. Even though 99 percent of sjw are white and utterly don't care some of them recognize the "oppression scale" and invoke natives in their acronyms
In liberal rhethoric. Social networks, MSM, everywhere. I even gave a link to the example. You could do your own research. Most part will omit natives.
Yes, only some of them. Why not everyone of them?
Nobody is "omitting" natives. Thats markedly untrue.
Why doesn't every person in Russia say the bolsheviks were a bunch of money grubbing, hook nosed, filthy zionist jews? They tell kids in israel stalin was worse than Hitler to the jews. How would that make sense if his wives were jew?
Why is your country "omitting" jew from the coup of a constitutional monarchy into the degradation of a communist shithole?