Hey bank, I lost a very important document saying I have $1.5 million dollars, it's totally real, but just lost. I'm gonna need that money deposited. And if anybody argues that I don't have $1.5 million I will launch a social media campaign to say you work with the enemy.
Which is to say that they likely destroyed both the Woods Files for the initial FISA warrant, as well as the 1st renewal, and then manufactured them based on what could not incriminate them after the fact...
And the first renewal.
Per the interview with Supervisiory Special Agent 1 Pg 43
MR. Berger ... So we don't have that original file and that's what creates the problem here, because at the heart of this entire matter and personnel law is notice. Right? Notice, what is expected of him. You're demanding an accounting. How is he to know what he's supposed to do unless he's told per policy what he's supposed to look at? We don't know what that original file alerted him to. So I'm reluctant to have him answer those questions.
MR. BAKER: I'm still confused who this reconstructed one, who reconstructed it. Did he go back in and redo it?
MR. BERGER: We learned and I believe I learned and we learned on Sunday, August 24th that the file that the OIG relied on and the file that we were being shown by the Bureau of Internal Affairs Unit was reconstructed by the case agent. There is a note in the file indicating that it was reconstructed from the original file on May 18, 2018, and where is the original file? We asked. No one knows. That's the one we want to look at.
MR. BAKER: So it was reconstructed from the original file?
MR. BERGER: There is a note. It's a non-sworn note saying this file was reconstructed from an original file. That's what it says in so many words, the same for Renewal No. 1, by the way, which is not involved here, but they run into the same problem. The thing is it was reconstructed. So it really is a hearsay document. So we have Case Agent No. 1 who is saying this is what the original document says and we're supposed to accept that as hearsay with no reliability factor whatsoever.
MR. BAKER: I understand the evidentiary problem. What I don't get is why is somebody reconstructing something from the original when you have the original?
MR. BERGER: That is a mystery that is yet to be resolved.
My, my... How how awfully convenient.
Hey bank, I lost a very important document saying I have $1.5 million dollars, it's totally real, but just lost. I'm gonna need that money deposited. And if anybody argues that I don't have $1.5 million I will launch a social media campaign to say you work with the enemy.
Which is to say that they likely destroyed both the Woods Files for the initial FISA warrant, as well as the 1st renewal, and then manufactured them based on what could not incriminate them after the fact...
And the first renewal. Per the interview with Supervisiory Special Agent 1 Pg 43