“As offensive as a statement can be, the FBI cannot open an investigation without a threat of violence or alleged criminal activity. In this case, we had no information anything was linked to a specific person,” he added
This is all I found on it, AP news says it isn't true. This could change however. While I do not see charges coming because it's hard to prove weasely mafia boss like tactics, it isn't out of the question that they might question him. It will be interesting to how organized this all was and who backed it all.
Axolotl_peyotl did you check an offizial source on this or just copy past a random tweet?
What i love about conspiracy forums is sometimes you get news and infos noone else publishes.
What i hate is often people are very fast to post a tweet or something else that fits their narrative without checking if its true or just random noise.
What i would love is a alternativenews.win site. I would even subscripe and pay for it when they research their topics and fill it with sources
Personally I love when people here drop breadcrumbs, giving me new ideas for following my own sources.
You often never know if posts is by a good guy posting real juicy conspiracy truth or if it's some shill propaganda. And even when it's linked sources, that source can also be propaganda or lies.
It's some users here I believe are good guys for us that like the truth, but still I always do my own research for the real truth.
Burninator is right...as the last impeachment farce showed, that the House can pretty much impeach for anything. Andrew Johnson, the guy before Clinton who was impeached...his crime was breaking the "Tenure in Office Act" a law later ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court that said that presidents can't fire those in the executive branch approved by the Senate. It failed by one vote.
Which is not part of the criminal code, and intentionally vague. It is whatever the house and senate want it to be. Long story short, if two thirds of the duly elected senators want POTUS out, he is out. It was an intentional check on the power of the president, by the founding fathers. It is an expression of the will of the people.
Link to FBI regarding who they are charging. Ill keep looking because I know I saw something directly regarding trump and fbi. Help is welcome unless you all want to keep crying below. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/thirteen-charged-federal-court-following-riot-united-states-capitol Close enough: https://www.thedailybeast.com/dc-fbi-insists-it-shared-intel-on-potential-violence-before-capitol-riots
D’Antuno said.
“As offensive as a statement can be, the FBI cannot open an investigation without a threat of violence or alleged criminal activity. In this case, we had no information anything was linked to a specific person,” he added
Reported by CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/13/politics/capitol-riot-investigation/index.html
Hmm. No sauce no pasta
Trying to find a release or source this guy got it from.
No good without a link to the report
This is all I found on it, AP news says it isn't true. This could change however. While I do not see charges coming because it's hard to prove weasely mafia boss like tactics, it isn't out of the question that they might question him. It will be interesting to how organized this all was and who backed it all.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9920241957
Until I see more than a tweet by some nobody I call Fake News.
Axolotl_peyotl did you check an offizial source on this or just copy past a random tweet?
What i love about conspiracy forums is sometimes you get news and infos noone else publishes.
What i hate is often people are very fast to post a tweet or something else that fits their narrative without checking if its true or just random noise.
What i would love is a alternativenews.win site. I would even subscripe and pay for it when they research their topics and fill it with sources
Personally I love when people here drop breadcrumbs, giving me new ideas for following my own sources.
You often never know if posts is by a good guy posting real juicy conspiracy truth or if it's some shill propaganda. And even when it's linked sources, that source can also be propaganda or lies.
It's some users here I believe are good guys for us that like the truth, but still I always do my own research for the real truth.
Impeachment has literally nothing to do with the criminal code.
Burninator is right...as the last impeachment farce showed, that the House can pretty much impeach for anything. Andrew Johnson, the guy before Clinton who was impeached...his crime was breaking the "Tenure in Office Act" a law later ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court that said that presidents can't fire those in the executive branch approved by the Senate. It failed by one vote.
This 9% approval rating congress has basically made a mockery of impeachment. Way to go, assholes.
"High crimes and misdemeanors"
Which is not part of the criminal code, and intentionally vague. It is whatever the house and senate want it to be. Long story short, if two thirds of the duly elected senators want POTUS out, he is out. It was an intentional check on the power of the president, by the founding fathers. It is an expression of the will of the people.