There has been a lot of talk past year about Bill Gate's using the COVID vaccine to implant a microchip made of Luciferase (they couldn't help themselves), which would be the Mark of the Beast.
However, COVID vaccine was met with unprecedented levels of resistance, with counter-narratives appearing from all sides, meaning that the installation of such microchip now might be an insurmountable wall, barring forced vaccinations.
We now have news of a new disease appearing on Asia, a "very dangerous one with 75% mortality rate", which will probably (and likely intentionally) start the 'pandemic' cycle anew.
Now, from the point of view of installing the mark of the beast, why would they need a new pandemic? They could just legally force everyone to be vaccinated. Many would resist, but the Bible already said many would not accept the mark anyway so that's expected. What if the unprecedented levels of resistance means that they are now unwilling to risk many more people resisting once they become aware of the microchip, so they came up with a new plan?
What if they sequential pandemics are being put out there so they can install the microchip in small sections, under the guise of being something else, and it won't be functional until all pieces come together, when it is too late to resist?
The Book of Revelation is a favorite of mine. Though, I recommend analyzing the other versus therein before worrying solely on the mark of the beast. Before the mark, there are the 7 seals (Rev. Chapter 5). The first 4, when opened, release the 4 horsemen - With all 7 seven finally opened, a 1/3 of of world is essentially destroyed (Rev. Chapter 8). Rev. 13:16 is the mark being described in the right hand; or in the forehead. There is so much more throughout the Book of Revelation of course, but if you are worried about the inevitable (Rev 22:19), just keep the faith.
If I remember correctly, it's 2/3 of the world destroyed. 1/3 by war and 1/3 by hunger and disease. I have to read it again. It's been a while. It does fit nicely with Georgia Guidestones, doesn't it? Now, right hand and forehead not necessarily are literal. What do you think?
Well, I was generalizing the verses referring to a 1/3 of trees/grass/water/moon/so on. And with the right hand and forehead issue, I interpret that as literal but the mark may not need to be necessarily physical perhaps? The mark could very well be an idea or concept? A hand signal/gesture done with the right hand to represent the mark, or an idea or thought in one's mind (forehead) perhaps?
Agreed. We won't know until it arrives.