She did nothing interesting at all, really. It's a level of junior python monkey. And it is completely fault of patriots, who willingly gave out all that data to private centralised service who promised free speech.
But there is very interesting thing you should think about:
If you do exactly the same with, say, Twitter (you can't imagine how simple it is), you will be immidiately sued, for datacenter DDoS, for hacking prprietary application, for "unlawfull access to private data", etc. You will find yourself criminally accused instantly. You even will have no time to grab some reasonable amount of data, because all of your instances running crawlers will be immidiately shutted down.
So, this was totally authorised by authorities working together with AWS. This is the proof of direct connection of government and BigBrother corporations. They together allowed her to organise and do that for the company they don't like and will never allow anybody to do exactly same thing to the company they like.
She create botnet of crawlers. Botnet activity resulted in huge spike of traffic. Traffic cost money for client. Every AWS instance have a protection against traffic spikes, to prevent bankruption of client in case of DDoS or similar attacks. AWS intentionally turned off all protection against traffic overdrawing for Parler instance. AWS did not shut or slow down instances with crawlers or filter external IPs who generated that traffic spike. All that openly described by the girl in her twitter without any fear of legal charges.
So, she knew for shure that:
any legal charges for such activity will be dropped by authorities
it will be possible to do the job in that bruteforce way, because AWS dropped all protections.
She did nothing interesting at all, really. It's a level of junior python monkey. And it is completely fault of patriots, who willingly gave out all that data to private centralised service who promised free speech.
But there is very interesting thing you should think about:
If you do exactly the same with, say, Twitter (you can't imagine how simple it is), you will be immidiately sued, for datacenter DDoS, for hacking prprietary application, for "unlawfull access to private data", etc. You will find yourself criminally accused instantly. You even will have no time to grab some reasonable amount of data, because all of your instances running crawlers will be immidiately shutted down.
So, this was totally authorised by authorities working together with AWS. This is the proof of direct connection of government and BigBrother corporations. They together allowed her to organise and do that for the company they don't like and will never allow anybody to do exactly same thing to the company they like.
You should consider investigating this further! Maybe, release your findings with us
There is nothing to investigate at all.
She create botnet of crawlers. Botnet activity resulted in huge spike of traffic. Traffic cost money for client. Every AWS instance have a protection against traffic spikes, to prevent bankruption of client in case of DDoS or similar attacks. AWS intentionally turned off all protection against traffic overdrawing for Parler instance. AWS did not shut or slow down instances with crawlers or filter external IPs who generated that traffic spike. All that openly described by the girl in her twitter without any fear of legal charges.
So, she knew for shure that:
Not a girl
Whatever. I'm standard rude intolerant barbarian Russian white suprematist, so I'm not very into all that rainbow gender stuff. :)