Correct. There's no conflict within motion, because opposites must coexist, since they're defined by each others coexistence within motion. What we "believe" to be conflicts is all based on believer vs non-believer (it's totally irrelevant what the topic is about; only that we consent to ignore reality for fiction).
Nature offers predefined information through motion (constant change demanding adaptation from all within), so it's neither true or false, just a flow of information meeting ONEs choice within to adhere to it or ignore it.
Both choices are needed for self sustenance of energy through motion, because one represents the loss of potentiality (motion) the other the recharge of potentiality through the unity of potential (momentum aka resistance to motion).
Correct. There's no conflict within motion, because opposites must coexist, since they're defined by each others coexistence within motion. What we "believe" to be conflicts is all based on believer vs non-believer (it's totally irrelevant what the topic is about; only that we consent to ignore reality for fiction).
Nature offers predefined information through motion (constant change demanding adaptation from all within), so it's neither true or false, just a flow of information meeting ONEs choice within to adhere to it or ignore it.
Both choices are needed for self sustenance of energy through motion, because one represents the loss of potentiality (motion) the other the recharge of potentiality through the unity of potential (momentum aka resistance to motion).