If I offer a video with the title "real" and one consents to it by believing or not believing the title "real", then I created a conflict between all those who believe and those who don't believe.
If I offer a video with the title "not real" and one consents to it by not believing or believing the title "not real", then I created a conflict between all those who believe and those who don't believe.
It is my offer; not the offered, that creates a conflict, between those who consented to my offer; not the offered. Their consent to my offer gives me control over their actions, because I'm in total control about what is offered.
My intent is the control through conflict, based on consent to offer; not what those within the conflict believe or not believe.
Correct. There's no conflict within motion, because opposites must coexist, since they're defined by each others coexistence within motion. What we "believe" to be conflicts is all based on believer vs non-believer (it's totally irrelevant what the topic is about; only that we consent to ignore reality for fiction).
Nature offers predefined information through motion (constant change demanding adaptation from all within), so it's neither true or false, just a flow of information meeting ONEs choice within to adhere to it or ignore it.
Both choices are needed for self sustenance of energy through motion, because one represents the loss of potentiality (motion) the other the recharge of potentiality through the unity of potential (momentum aka resistance to motion).
It’s called the cocktail party effect. When you’re in a crowded bar with lots of people talking, your brain is able to make sense of the audio coming from the person you want to focus on. If you set up a microphone in a crowded bar you’ll get only crowded bar noise. Modern cell phones have an algorithm to try and do the same thing. It’s two different videos from two different devices which picked up different parts of a crowded noisy hallway.
Aftermath interview with the guy in the blue hoodie next to Ashley. I have seen around the internet that some are saying he signaled the shooter, whether it be true or not.
If I offer a video with the title "real" and one consents to it by believing or not believing the title "real", then I created a conflict between all those who believe and those who don't believe. If I offer a video with the title "not real" and one consents to it by not believing or believing the title "not real", then I created a conflict between all those who believe and those who don't believe. It is my offer; not the offered, that creates a conflict, between those who consented to my offer; not the offered. Their consent to my offer gives me control over their actions, because I'm in total control about what is offered. My intent is the control through conflict, based on consent to offer; not what those within the conflict believe or not believe.
This guy gets it.
I don't. Could you elaborate?
I watched both clips and heard gunshot both times.
Correct. There's no conflict within motion, because opposites must coexist, since they're defined by each others coexistence within motion. What we "believe" to be conflicts is all based on believer vs non-believer (it's totally irrelevant what the topic is about; only that we consent to ignore reality for fiction).
Nature offers predefined information through motion (constant change demanding adaptation from all within), so it's neither true or false, just a flow of information meeting ONEs choice within to adhere to it or ignore it.
Both choices are needed for self sustenance of energy through motion, because one represents the loss of potentiality (motion) the other the recharge of potentiality through the unity of potential (momentum aka resistance to motion).
https://www.dxomark.com/what-is-audio-zoom-for-smartphones/
It’s called the cocktail party effect. When you’re in a crowded bar with lots of people talking, your brain is able to make sense of the audio coming from the person you want to focus on. If you set up a microphone in a crowded bar you’ll get only crowded bar noise. Modern cell phones have an algorithm to try and do the same thing. It’s two different videos from two different devices which picked up different parts of a crowded noisy hallway.
Aftermath interview with the guy in the blue hoodie next to Ashley. I have seen around the internet that some are saying he signaled the shooter, whether it be true or not.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1346929732756119566