Definitely. It's why removing God is so important for the controllers. Humans will always look for an authority to guide them. Under Christianity, you look towards God and Jesus as an authority to live by. It's an individual's responsibility to strive to be as moral and perfect as Jesus Christ was. No one else can save you but yourself.
A void is left inside someone when God is removed. You start looking at the State and its institutions for authority. They teach that you are a worthless speck on a spinning ball flying through infinite emptiness. A mere germ that crawled out of the swamps and with nothing but luck and unfathomable time-frames were able to mutate into a conscious being. You are not divine; you are an accident of chaos. Or worst yet, a mistake.
Someone who knows they are divine and understands the strength of personal responsibility is harder to control than someone who thinks they are worthless and looks to the state for entitlements.
SCI'ENCE, noun (Latin scientia, from scio) - " to know". Comprehension (knowledge) represents the processing of what ONEs consciousness perceives from ALL information offered.
In between perception (input) and comprehension (processing) operates ones free will of choice to either adhere to self sustenance (defined by ALL) or ignore it. That choice defines each of ones actions (output).
What is science suppose to offer? Help from other ones for ONE to comprehended ALL. So science is a substitute source (fiction) to the information nature (reality) offers. What does "science" requires from ONE to work as a substitute source for information? Consent by ones free will of choice to "believe" the assumptions made by other ones about what ALL means; offered to ONE "in the name of" science.
Science is therefore an idol ONE believes in, that sits in-between ONEs comprehension of what he perceives from ALL offered; established by consent to a substitute offer through a contract of belief.
The definition of what the idol called "science" means is being controlled by those you consented to by believing them, and they can now act in the name of science to redefine your beliefs.
I’m with you 100%. Only trusting what “science” says is a religion. People forget that “scientists” are fallible humans and many don’t know that the system itself is a sham. It’s why I just laugh it off when I’m judged for my religion by my peers who think they’re so much more logical than me. They’re more zealous than even I am, but for Science.
Definitely. It's why removing God is so important for the controllers. Humans will always look for an authority to guide them. Under Christianity, you look towards God and Jesus as an authority to live by. It's an individual's responsibility to strive to be as moral and perfect as Jesus Christ was. No one else can save you but yourself.
A void is left inside someone when God is removed. You start looking at the State and its institutions for authority. They teach that you are a worthless speck on a spinning ball flying through infinite emptiness. A mere germ that crawled out of the swamps and with nothing but luck and unfathomable time-frames were able to mutate into a conscious being. You are not divine; you are an accident of chaos. Or worst yet, a mistake.
Someone who knows they are divine and understands the strength of personal responsibility is harder to control than someone who thinks they are worthless and looks to the state for entitlements.
SCI'ENCE, noun (Latin scientia, from scio) - " to know". Comprehension (knowledge) represents the processing of what ONEs consciousness perceives from ALL information offered.
In between perception (input) and comprehension (processing) operates ones free will of choice to either adhere to self sustenance (defined by ALL) or ignore it. That choice defines each of ones actions (output).
What is science suppose to offer? Help from other ones for ONE to comprehended ALL. So science is a substitute source (fiction) to the information nature (reality) offers. What does "science" requires from ONE to work as a substitute source for information? Consent by ones free will of choice to "believe" the assumptions made by other ones about what ALL means; offered to ONE "in the name of" science.
Science is therefore an idol ONE believes in, that sits in-between ONEs comprehension of what he perceives from ALL offered; established by consent to a substitute offer through a contract of belief.
The definition of what the idol called "science" means is being controlled by those you consented to by believing them, and they can now act in the name of science to redefine your beliefs.
I’m with you 100%. Only trusting what “science” says is a religion. People forget that “scientists” are fallible humans and many don’t know that the system itself is a sham. It’s why I just laugh it off when I’m judged for my religion by my peers who think they’re so much more logical than me. They’re more zealous than even I am, but for Science.
Obvious troll is obvious
That's literally the definition. You don't just claim "Fairies make the flowers grow because jesus loves me". You have to prove it.
Prove the earth is flat or go fuck yourself, troll.
No
No