"Directed Energy Weapons" refer to any number of types of unconventional and exotic weaponry.
The full range of these weapons is classified information, so no attempts will be made to distinguish between categories within the realm of energy weapons, as doing so would imply specific knowledge of all that are available.
In addition, no claim is be made about whether the directed energy weapon operates from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform, nor are any claims made about whether or not it involves sound waves, antimatter weapons, scalar weapons, a facility like HAARP, etc.
However, the evidence appears consistent with the use of energy weapons that go well beyond the capabilities of conventional explosives.
Wikipedia article on Directed-Energy Weapons
Although speculation about DEWs on 9/11 began shortly after the event, one of the first scientists with relevant credentials to publicly propose the DEW hypothesis was Dr. Judy Wood, a former professor of mechanical engineering.
The following material is largely from her book Where Did the Towers Go?, as well as from her old and new websites.
Where Did the Towers Go?
I. 9/11 Enigmas
II. New Nomenclature
Holes
Every building that was destroyed had a prefix of WTC. There was surprisingly little collateral damage to nearby buildings that were not targeted.
The WTC buildings that were not totally destroyed had multiple circular holes visible at Ground Zero, especially in buildings WTC5 and WTC6.
Notice how straight the vertical holes were that cut down through WTC6
This photo highlights the depth of the hole in WTC6 - While there is abundance of aluminum cladding on the roofs of buildings 5 and 6, there is little or none in the holes.
The vertical holes in WTC6 (U.S. Customs Building) have the shape of cylindrical core samples in soil. What could have done this? Whatever it was produced vertically straight holes while doing little apparent horizontal damage to the balance of the interior of WTC6. In addition, the parking garage below WTC6 remained essentially undamaged.
Banker's Trust, a 40-story building, had pulverized dust and some WTC aluminum cladding on its roof -- plus some damage mostly confined to its lower floors - This same pattern prevails in other damaged buildings adjacent to the WTC complex.
This is surprisingly little damage following destruction of 110-story buildings directly across the street. Why is there no serious damage to the adjacent buildings above the 20th floors of those buildings? Such damage is less than 20% of the height of a Twin Tower.
Disintegration and pulverization into talcum-powder-sized dust above the 20th floors might explain this.
WTC5 on the left, the U.S. Postal Service building, and the two buildings to the right (north) of the postal building, have only modest dust and a few pieces of aluminum cladding on their roofs. A jet engine piece was found at the corner of Murray and Church Streets as indicated.
WFC2 had only pulverized dust and WTC aluminum cladding on its roofs - WFC2 suffered only window damage only to its lower floors, despite the destruction of a 1/4-mile high building across the street.
In this image, some debris has been cleared, but the pulverized dust is still emerging - If most of the steel from the upper floors of WTC1 and WTC2 was pulverized, then how much steel was really shipped as scrap to China? Does anyone have these figures or the receipts?
A view over the dome of WFC2 shows the damage to WTC6 in the center of the photo - To the left is the collapsed WTC7. Its debris stack is at least five stories high. To the right of WTC6 is the remaining north wall of WTC1 which leans toward WTC6.
Where did the wall go? Where did the top 100 floors of the north wall go? They did not fall on WTC6 or WTC7 because there are no steel wheatchex there. Some of the core of WTC1 remains, but where is the rest of the core? The amount of steel on the ground barely covers the ground.
This shows the vertical cut-outs in the center of WTC6 - To the left of WTC6 are the remains of WTC1. Note the fairly consistent diameter of the holes, which are essentially empty.
No collapsed floors are visible at the bottom of the hole and the heart of the building is gone. A bomb cannot do this. The debris inside the building is minimal and it all is at ground level, no deeper.
The base of the north wall of WTC1 is to the left of WTC6, and you can see the remains of a cluster of core columns in the center of the WTC1 footprint. The debris from WTC1 is almost non-existent, dwarfed by the remains of the 8-story WTC6.
Inside the 8-story WTC6 hole - The vertical cut-outs do indeed appear to go completely to the ground floor, with relatively little debris remaining. The evidence suggests that all 8 floors somehow were pulverized or "disappeared."
This image shows the roof of WTC5, with considerable aluminum and some steel wheatchex on the left (south) and top (west).
What could cause these holes? WTC5 is not adjacent to a Twin Tower, as WTC4 and WTC6 were. Thus WTC5 was less likely to suffer damage from the destruction of a Twin Tower than WTC4 and WTC6 were.
The remains of WTC4, a 9-story building, are at the lower left and the remains of WTC5, a 9-story building, are on the right - The main part of building 4, a 9-story building, virtually disappeared, leaving the north wing standing.
The main part of WTC4 disappeared with virtually no debris left on the ground. The "new" left-hand (south) side of the remaining wing of WTC4 is remarkably vertical and linear, appearing to have been cut straight down through the building from above. What could have made such a straight cut through WTC4, slicing off a large portion of the building?
Here is the north wing of WTC4, as viewed from Church Streed, looking west, appears surgically removed from the main body of WTC4, which has essentially disappeared - If WTC2 fell on it and squashed the main building, where is the part of WTC2 that did this?
Ground Zero workers near a stepladder in hole 2 in Liberty Street, identified here - The remaining wall of WTC2 is in the background.
In the image with the workers there is some strange "toasted" steel. There is a long red beam that rises from the lower-right corner that looks wavy like a serpent. Before the steel disintegrates, does it crinkle, become wavy, or shrivel?
Near the tip of the "serpent" there is a vertical piece of material that has a gold-copper appearance. Below the ladder, there are two similar gold pieces that are highly reflective. The WTC2 shows a strange pattern where the lower portion of a steel column is missing, but not its upper portion.
Was gravity acting up at that point? In the background, behind the ladder, you can see a section of intact sidewalk with almost no debris on it. This is at the base of the 110-story South Tower, yet the sidewalk was not crushed by falling debris.
GZ workers descend into the subbasements below WTC2 - While there is extensive damage, there is little building debris at the bottom of the hole. There is no sign of molten metal. A worker in the distance walks along a massive core column.
This hole adjacent to WTC2 is through sidewalk and pavement exhibits a number of anomalous effects - One example is the missing lower portion of that beam on the right end.
The three outer columns in the center of the picture have a strange flanged appearance as if they had unfolded, and they look cooked. It looks as if a steel wheatchex dove into the hole. The fact that you can only see the tip of the wheatchex shows how far down the hole goes.
The WTC2 columns are "pitch fork handles" at the lobby level, spaced on 10-foot centers. A six-foot person could lay between the columns with his feet against one column and reach out and almost touch the adjacent column. Large cars and trucks can fit between these columns.
Therefore the column unwrapping effect is huge. In addition, there are "serpent-like" steel beam remnants hanging over the hole and they look as though they stopped short of complete disintegration.
The metal in the lower right corner of the picture, with a camouflage appearance, looks deformed and dissolved as if attacked by acid. There is a large amount of material distributed throughout that looks as if it were run through a paper shredder. In the lower levels, concrete rebar is exposed apparently because the concrete attached to it was pulverized.
This photo was taken inside the mall on one week later - Does this look like a 1/4-mile tall tower crash-landed or pancake-collapsed into the basement? The mall is the first floor below all this steel, yet the mall was not crushed.
Psyops
It has been widely reported that molten metal burned at Ground Zero (GZ) for up to 99 days despite continuous water poured on them and numerous rain storms.
Supposedly, this is a smoking gun for controlled demolition. But, are these stories true?
The official government image of thermal hot spots at Ground Zero five days after the event
12 days after the event
Assuming the data are valid, the image from September 23 shows no large hot spots anywhere, casting doubt on the stories of long-lived molten metal.
There are other reasons to doubt the stories of "pools of molten metal."
First, the stories of molten metal come from interested parties like the head of Tully Construction and Controlled Demolition, Inc.
Second, there are no photos of molten metal that we believe are reliable.
Third, there are no photos of the solidified molten metal after it cooled either in place or being carried out. There's no evidence of molten metal before, during, or after.
Fourth, the molten metal may be a cover story to hide the grim truth. Vehicle dust kicked up on a dirt road does not take six months to settle out. Dust from traditional controlled demolition settles out quickly, even after being jack-hammered and pushed around.
But the dust at the WTC was so ultra-fine that hosing it down would have been a wise thing to do. It is quite possible that GZ workers were not hosing down molten metal but were hosing down ultra-fine dust and the fumes of molecular dissociation.
Explosions
The use of DEWs on 9/11 does not mean some demolition variant was employed that day. However, controlled demolition is woefully inadequate to explain the nature of the towers' destruction.
Getting it started
Decoy squibs?
Cold Fusion & Thermite
Steven Jones sabotaged the 911 truth, as he did with Cold Fusion. Steven Jones is an opportunist who was tipped off by "DoE informants" to help coverup the reality of free energy. The film "Heavy Watergate" has more information about the Jones sabotaging Pons and Fleischman and their cold fusion breakthrough.
Original image - The fellow with the shovel, wearing a blue shirt, appears to be standing down in this hole.
This is the doctored image Steven Jones captions "Workers evidently peering into the hot “core” under the WTC rubble."
Original image
Steven Jones' doctored image where he claims the bright-white spots are evidence of thermite. The psyop is to train the viewer to see "thermite" when they see this photo.
Where is the proof of concept for the thermite hypothesis? Where is the proof that thermite or thermate has ever been used to bring down major buildings in controlled demolition (not simply cleaning up debris)?