"Directed Energy Weapons" refer to any number of types of unconventional and exotic weaponry.
The full range of these weapons is classified information, so no attempts will be made to distinguish between categories within the realm of energy weapons, as doing so would imply specific knowledge of all that are available.
In addition, no claim is be made about whether the directed energy weapon operates from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform, nor are any claims made about whether or not it involves sound waves, antimatter weapons, scalar weapons, a facility like HAARP, etc.
However, the evidence appears consistent with the use of energy weapons that go well beyond the capabilities of conventional explosives.
Wikipedia article on Directed-Energy Weapons
Although speculation about DEWs on 9/11 began shortly after the event, one of the first scientists with relevant credentials to publicly propose the DEW hypothesis was Dr. Judy Wood, a former professor of mechanical engineering.
The following material is largely from her book Where Did the Towers Go?, as well as from her old and new websites.
Where Did the Towers Go?
I. 9/11 Enigmas
II. New Nomenclature
Psyops
It has been widely reported that molten metal burned at Ground Zero (GZ) for up to 99 days despite continuous water poured on them and numerous rain storms.
Supposedly, this is a smoking gun for controlled demolition. But, are these stories true?
The official government image of thermal hot spots at Ground Zero five days after the event
12 days after the event
Assuming the data are valid, the image from September 23 shows no large hot spots anywhere, casting doubt on the stories of long-lived molten metal.
There are other reasons to doubt the stories of "pools of molten metal."
First, the stories of molten metal come from interested parties like the head of Tully Construction and Controlled Demolition, Inc.
Second, there are no photos of molten metal that we believe are reliable.
Third, there are no photos of the solidified molten metal after it cooled either in place or being carried out. There's no evidence of molten metal before, during, or after.
Fourth, the molten metal may be a cover story to hide the grim truth. Vehicle dust kicked up on a dirt road does not take six months to settle out. Dust from traditional controlled demolition settles out quickly, even after being jack-hammered and pushed around.
But the dust at the WTC was so ultra-fine that hosing it down would have been a wise thing to do. It is quite possible that GZ workers were not hosing down molten metal but were hosing down ultra-fine dust and the fumes of molecular dissociation.
Explosions
The use of DEWs on 9/11 does not mean some demolition variant was employed that day. However, controlled demolition is woefully inadequate to explain the nature of the towers' destruction.
Getting it started
Decoy squibs?
Cold Fusion & Thermite
Steven Jones sabotaged the 911 truth, as he did with Cold Fusion. Steven Jones is an opportunist who was tipped off by "DoE informants" to help coverup the reality of free energy. The film "Heavy Watergate" has more information about the Jones sabotaging Pons and Fleischman and their cold fusion breakthrough.
Original image - The fellow with the shovel, wearing a blue shirt, appears to be standing down in this hole.
This is the doctored image Steven Jones captions "Workers evidently peering into the hot “core” under the WTC rubble."
Original image
Steven Jones' doctored image where he claims the bright-white spots are evidence of thermite. The psyop is to train the viewer to see "thermite" when they see this photo.
Where is the proof of concept for the thermite hypothesis? Where is the proof that thermite or thermate has ever been used to bring down major buildings in controlled demolition (not simply cleaning up debris)?