How classy you start with a typical put-down ad hominem, used by PR people and others not interested in finding out the truth or even engaging in a discussion. You can do better, can you?
There is also zero hits for the document identification "100-530-8X" or any of the referenced text fragments from that page at National Security Archive (nsarchive.gwu.edu) or at National Archives Catalog (catalog.archives.gov).
So, probably a forgery, the proof for authenticity rests on the claimant.
That does infact seem possible, hadn't been able to find anything refuting it at all before this, Im going to look into it and see if metabunks analysis holds up but, this doc is part of a rather large dump of other documents, id be surprised if they were all forgeries, not impossible but thousands of pages of other FBI declassified info lends credence in my eyes to its validity.
Haha fren, call me skeptical when racist posts racist bullshit that can only be found on racist site! The source is biased and shitty from the top to the bottom.
How classy you start with a typical put-down ad hominem, used by PR people and others not interested in finding out the truth or even engaging in a discussion. You can do better, can you?
There it is at archive.org in section "National Security Archive" on page 118: https://archive.org/details/Anti-DefamationLeague/1199215-000%20---%20100-HQ-530%20---%20Section%202.PDF/page/n117/mode/2up
However, that doesn't mean it is correct or authentic.
Metabunkers found this: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-exemption-from-military-service-doc-proves-jews-had-foreknowledge-of-ww2-fake-leaflet.10493/
There is also zero hits for the document identification "100-530-8X" or any of the referenced text fragments from that page at National Security Archive (nsarchive.gwu.edu) or at National Archives Catalog (catalog.archives.gov).
So, probably a forgery, the proof for authenticity rests on the claimant.
That does infact seem possible, hadn't been able to find anything refuting it at all before this, Im going to look into it and see if metabunks analysis holds up but, this doc is part of a rather large dump of other documents, id be surprised if they were all forgeries, not impossible but thousands of pages of other FBI declassified info lends credence in my eyes to its validity.
Did you see his name? Or was it too complicated to figure out he's a racist piece of trash pushing hate propaganda?
It's not even a dog whistle, it's a fucking wolf airhorn.
So what?
Do you not understand the rules of argument or the proof required for truth or for falsification ?
Maybe he is the biggest racist in the universe, who knows?
But that alone doesn't make her/his claim invalid.
This is reasoning 101. We are not in the kangaroo court of public, where calling somebody X automatically makes her/him wrong.
You may feel it does, but that feeling does not make it so.
Haha fren, call me skeptical when racist posts racist bullshit that can only be found on racist site! The source is biased and shitty from the top to the bottom.