The REAL story of signature verification in Georgia
(twitter.com)
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Guess who did the "risk limiting" audit in GA?
VotingWorks
OP could have an argument with the Tweet he posted. Of course, it will come down to how much discretion is afforded to the clerk — but an argument can be made in OP's favor nonetheless. For the record, and as I have pointed out to you before, you're wrong.
VotingWorks indeed did assist with an audit in Georgia, however it for the Democratic primary. The Presidential election, on the other hand, was subject to a fully manual, hand-sorting audit. This audit was completed by county election officials, not VotingWorks.
That "fully manual hand sorting audit" should be called a "hand recount" because they just recounted the ballots by hand and compared it to the machine count. This doesn't find mail-in fraud. Multiple counties around the country had impossibly low rejection rates of mail-in ballots when compared to past elections. Why do you shills fight so hard against transparency?
Bear in mind, your initial objection herein was to who conducted the audit. Having seen you're wrong, you're now objecting to how the audit was conducted. In trial advocacy, this is what we call inconsistency and bias. It looks really bad to a jury.
In my personal opinion, I would totally support a signature audit. However, there is no warrant to delay the transition of power to do so, as we do not presume regularly conducted elections to be fraudulent until proven valid. Likewise, I fully expect to hear another round of complaints from the MAGA crowd about "undue exercise of discretion" when a signature with an extra squiggle is not rejected in the audit. Because — at the end of the day — members of that crowd are concerned primarily with winning, not with whether the election was valid.
lol, this shill is followed on Twitter by the Heritage Foundation, Newt Gingrich, GA GOP, etc.
You people will believe the most obvious stunts.
This coming from top minds like you who only post MSM talking points.
Keep posting your talking points, no one here believes you.
Hey calling all shills;
I am talking to you:
Minuet
NelsonMandelaAffect
Syrian
barronwin
newuserfromreddit
MagaPede69
Eisenhorn
All of you shills please continue posting MSM shit that no one here will believe for a second.
It is completely wasted effort and I laugh as all you fools keep trying pathetically to push the MSM narrative.
Can you let me know which “MSM talking points” I've been posting? I’d love to know.
Meanwhile, you can keep believing every Republican PR stunt that random people on Twitter trot out.
Shill
How do we know this is real? This guy is probably larping for retweets.
Shills in the comments crying "fAkE nEwS!!!!!!!!!"