That still worse then what consider the acceptable rate in a federal elections
Since the tolerance is 1 error for every 250,000 votes.
So this is 32x worse meaning the election should be toss as it didn't meet the federal standard.
That "debunking" is just the Georgia officials saying it was debunked. The same Georgia officials complicit in the fraud and the same Georgia officials that are blocking an audit of Fulton county, which contains the cesspool of corruption that is Atlanta. I'm glad the riggers are able to assure me that no rigging took place while observers weren't even in the room.
See my other response to you, there's already been an audit. Observers are not required to be in the room, as my link makes clear. Of course, there's also this, this, this, and this — but sure, they're wrong too, there couldn't possibly be any acceptable explanation other than fraud.
This obviously has nothing to do with you being too committed to your position to admit you're wrong. It's not like this view is so rejected that it's literally had to escape to an eco-chamber website to be heard. News publishers definitely aren't retracting stories supporting election fraud out of fear of defamation lawsuits. The U.S. judiciary writ large totally hasn't categorically rejected election fraud claims.
A real full audit was not done and the people who did the "risk-limiting" audit was created and funded by big tech and the Soros foundation, how convenient for you. I'm sure you see nothing wrong with this, one of these companies is probably written on your paycheck.
VotingWorks was created within and incubated by the left-leaning Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) in December 2018 and later and spun off as a separate non-profit. [7] [8] CDT’s major donors are large technology firms, such as Amazon, Google, Facebook, Apple, and Microsoft; and large left-of-center foundations, including George Soros’s Foundation to Promote Open Society, the Ford Foundation, and the MacArthur Foundation. [9] [10]
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, VotingWorks announced it would be helping states scale-up voting by mail. An April 2020 news release announced VotingWorks was building VxMail, a set of tools to help implement and deploy vote-by mail with services such as ballot printing, envelope stuffing, mailing, ballot receipt, signature verification, and ballot tabulation.VxMail is designed to assist jurisdictions that previously had only a few hundred ballots to deal with manually, but now may have thousands or tens of thousands.
As I pointed out in my other comment, you're wrong here as well. Please check your sources and conduct your due diligence before posting disinformation, it makes legitimate conspiracy theories look bad.
Funny how the debunking article doesn't encourage readers to watch the video for them selves. They don't "put away ballots" under the table "thinking they were getting to go home" right before most people leave. The cases had been there all day and at one point one of the guys that stays late, checks on the cases in the middle of the day.
VotingWorks was created within and incubated by the left-leaning Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) in December 2018 and later and spun off as a separate non-profit. [7] [8] CDT’s major donors are large technology firms, such as Amazon, Google, Facebook, Apple, and Microsoft; and large left-of-center foundations, including George Soros’s Foundation to Promote Open Society, the Ford Foundation, and the MacArthur Foundation. [9] [10]
In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, VotingWorks announced it would be helping states scale-up voting by mail. An April 2020 news release announced VotingWorks was building VxMail, a set of tools to help implement and deploy vote-by mail with services such as ballot printing, envelope stuffing, mailing, ballot receipt, signature verification, and ballot tabulation.VxMail is designed to assist jurisdictions that previously had only a few hundred ballots to deal with manually, but now may have thousands or tens of thousands.
I know you don't care about bias or big tech manipulation because these companies provide your income at the moment, but one day these people will come for you also and there will be no one left to help. Your delusion of moral superiority will not save you when they decide you are no longer useful to them.
I'm sorry to be rude, but do you seriously do any sort of due diligence on the things you post? I'll respond in kind, for anyone else to see — but this time with the correct information, not MAGA propaganda.
Further, the fact that you think anyone would seriously pay someone to shill on this hundred-member website — let alone in response to someone who apparently can't even check their sources — is downright laughable. I post and comment on here when I want to take a break from work. I couldn't care less about whether you think I'm morally superior, it's just cathartic to see how pathetic these election fraud conspiracies are.
We want a SIGNATURE AUDIT in Fulton County, GA. They called what they did a "risk-limiting audit" which was just a hand recount tally of the ballots compared to the machine tally. This "audit" (recount) doesn't find the mail-in ballot fraud that happened. It literally just recounted the fraudulent votes, giving the same results like you said.
This post is about a signature audit in Cobb county and you shills make it out to seem like everything in GA is now settled, fraud deboonked! Now do that signature check in the shithole Fulton county and this issue will be settled. But they won't and we all know why. Multiple counties around the country had impossibly low rejection rates of mail-in ballots when compared to past elections. Why do you shills fight so hard against transparency?
Oh, so now your objection isn't to who conducted the audit, but how they conducted it. In fact, as I post this I see you're editing your prior comments herein to specify you want a signature audit. Of course, disregard the fact that you were previously concerned about:
bias or big tech manipulation
And that the:
audit was created and funded by big tech and the Soros foundation
Lol, no of course you weren't really concerned about those — just as you're not really concerned about a signature audit. In reality, you're just latching on to whatever remaining branch you can to falsely claim election fraud. Bear in mind, that everything has been settled within Georgia — the results have been certified my guy. There is no fraud to debunk, as the Trump campaign routinely fails to allege any. Even when presented with direct evidence (i.e., this post) that a statistically insignificant amount of signatures did not match within a sample, you still cling to your cope-driven narrative.
Ultimately, you have no evidence to support your position. Even if a signature audit was conducted in Fulton County, you would still find a way to cry wolf when it comes back showing no fraud. To this point, you (and your other TD.W shills) will continue complaining after January 6th, after January 20th, and all the way up until 2024. You lost. With all due respect, grow a pair, get out of your safe space, and get over it.
I edited my comment to clarify that I want a signature audit because you responded with articles about hand recounts when the initial post is about a SIGNATURE AUDIT in Cobb County. I assumed we were on the topic of looking at signatures but you derailed into hand recount audits.
What's funny about GA and election fraud is Stacy Abrams has been screaming that her gubernatorial race was stolen from her through "irregularities" and "gross mismanagement" for years now, with mainstream media backing her up on these claims. She was even rolled out in front of a microphone after Trump's State of the Union speech to talk about how verifying ballot integrity is 'akchually' voter suppression, setting the stage for what we see today. Now that it's not your media's chosen leftist, silence and deflection at every level.
will continue complaining after January 6th, after January 20th, and all the way up until 2024. You lost. With all due respect, grow a pair, get out of your safe space, and get over it.
That is absolutely classic coming from a leftist shill. Do I need to remind you how pathetic you have been for the past 4 years? No, I'm sure it's still fresh in your mind. That's why you are here, after all; a cheap form of revenge. Why else waste time on such a small forum shilling the mainstream narrative?
The media tortured you for 4 years with nothing but vile hatred, not us. Remember that.
Or any legitimate fraud for that matter. The only case I've actually seen proven is the guy who tried to vote for Trump as his dead mother and dead mother-in-law.
They must think we're really, really stupid.
I imagine they do.
Haha this one made my day. I luv you.
Seems totally legit.
We want a Fulton county (Atlanta) audit... no one cares about Cobb and thats why they chose it
That still worse then what consider the acceptable rate in a federal elections Since the tolerance is 1 error for every 250,000 votes. So this is 32x worse meaning the election should be toss as it didn't meet the federal standard.
Cue salty MAGA boys that wanted more election fraud.
What's the hot MSM take on the video in GA of suitcases being pulled out from under the table after observers had left?
Hi, I'm John Wilkes Booth. I just wanna say the MSM has debunked that rumor about the Lincoln assassination.
They were gay lovers in a fight. Duh
Not sure about the MSM, but here's the primary right-aligned, local newspaper debunking the suitcase claim.
Case closed fellas, it's been deboooonked
Yes, the riggers said they didn't rig! Pack it up boys
I know right, thanks!
That "debunking" is just the Georgia officials saying it was debunked. The same Georgia officials complicit in the fraud and the same Georgia officials that are blocking an audit of Fulton county, which contains the cesspool of corruption that is Atlanta. I'm glad the riggers are able to assure me that no rigging took place while observers weren't even in the room.
See my other response to you, there's already been an audit. Observers are not required to be in the room, as my link makes clear. Of course, there's also this, this, this, and this — but sure, they're wrong too, there couldn't possibly be any acceptable explanation other than fraud.
This obviously has nothing to do with you being too committed to your position to admit you're wrong. It's not like this view is so rejected that it's literally had to escape to an eco-chamber website to be heard. News publishers definitely aren't retracting stories supporting election fraud out of fear of defamation lawsuits. The U.S. judiciary writ large totally hasn't categorically rejected election fraud claims.
A real full audit was not done and the people who did the "risk-limiting" audit was created and funded by big tech and the Soros foundation, how convenient for you. I'm sure you see nothing wrong with this, one of these companies is probably written on your paycheck.
VotingWorks
As I pointed out in my other comment, you're wrong here as well. Please check your sources and conduct your due diligence before posting disinformation, it makes legitimate conspiracy theories look bad.
Keep pushing MSM talking points shill.
Happy to! I see you're still not a fan of challenging any of my points head on.
Funny how the debunking article doesn't encourage readers to watch the video for them selves. They don't "put away ballots" under the table "thinking they were getting to go home" right before most people leave. The cases had been there all day and at one point one of the guys that stays late, checks on the cases in the middle of the day.
You know we want a full signature audit of Fulton county, right?
Already happened. Trump lost. Bigly.
You know who did the "risk-limiting" audits?? I know you don't care, because you are a paid shill, but I'll post this for anyone else to see.
VotingWorks
I know you don't care about bias or big tech manipulation because these companies provide your income at the moment, but one day these people will come for you also and there will be no one left to help. Your delusion of moral superiority will not save you when they decide you are no longer useful to them.
I'm sorry to be rude, but do you seriously do any sort of due diligence on the things you post? I'll respond in kind, for anyone else to see — but this time with the correct information, not MAGA propaganda.
VotingWorks indeed did assist with an audit in Georgia, however it for the Democratic primary. The Presidential election, on the other hand, was subject to a fully manual, hand-sorting audit. This audit was completed by county election officials, not VotingWorks.
Further, the fact that you think anyone would seriously pay someone to shill on this hundred-member website — let alone in response to someone who apparently can't even check their sources — is downright laughable. I post and comment on here when I want to take a break from work. I couldn't care less about whether you think I'm morally superior, it's just cathartic to see how pathetic these election fraud conspiracies are.
We want a SIGNATURE AUDIT in Fulton County, GA. They called what they did a "risk-limiting audit" which was just a hand recount tally of the ballots compared to the machine tally. This "audit" (recount) doesn't find the mail-in ballot fraud that happened. It literally just recounted the fraudulent votes, giving the same results like you said.
This post is about a signature audit in Cobb county and you shills make it out to seem like everything in GA is now settled, fraud deboonked! Now do that signature check in the shithole Fulton county and this issue will be settled. But they won't and we all know why. Multiple counties around the country had impossibly low rejection rates of mail-in ballots when compared to past elections. Why do you shills fight so hard against transparency?
Oh, so now your objection isn't to who conducted the audit, but how they conducted it. In fact, as I post this I see you're editing your prior comments herein to specify you want a signature audit. Of course, disregard the fact that you were previously concerned about:
And that the:
Lol, no of course you weren't really concerned about those — just as you're not really concerned about a signature audit. In reality, you're just latching on to whatever remaining branch you can to falsely claim election fraud. Bear in mind, that everything has been settled within Georgia — the results have been certified my guy. There is no fraud to debunk, as the Trump campaign routinely fails to allege any. Even when presented with direct evidence (i.e., this post) that a statistically insignificant amount of signatures did not match within a sample, you still cling to your cope-driven narrative.
Ultimately, you have no evidence to support your position. Even if a signature audit was conducted in Fulton County, you would still find a way to cry wolf when it comes back showing no fraud. To this point, you (and your other TD.W shills) will continue complaining after January 6th, after January 20th, and all the way up until 2024. You lost. With all due respect, grow a pair, get out of your safe space, and get over it.
See you on the 20th <3
I edited my comment to clarify that I want a signature audit because you responded with articles about hand recounts when the initial post is about a SIGNATURE AUDIT in Cobb County. I assumed we were on the topic of looking at signatures but you derailed into hand recount audits.
What's funny about GA and election fraud is Stacy Abrams has been screaming that her gubernatorial race was stolen from her through "irregularities" and "gross mismanagement" for years now, with mainstream media backing her up on these claims. She was even rolled out in front of a microphone after Trump's State of the Union speech to talk about how verifying ballot integrity is 'akchually' voter suppression, setting the stage for what we see today. Now that it's not your media's chosen leftist, silence and deflection at every level.
That is absolutely classic coming from a leftist shill. Do I need to remind you how pathetic you have been for the past 4 years? No, I'm sure it's still fresh in your mind. That's why you are here, after all; a cheap form of revenge. Why else waste time on such a small forum shilling the mainstream narrative?
The media tortured you for 4 years with nothing but vile hatred, not us. Remember that.
Or any legitimate fraud for that matter. The only case I've actually seen proven is the guy who tried to vote for Trump as his dead mother and dead mother-in-law.
You know we want an audit of Fulton county, right?
Keep pushing MSM talking points shill.