We don't have to pretend. If you're actually a video editor like you claim you should have a basic understanding of the physics behind lenses. I won't address any other points here because you didn't really make any, just that the math for lenses is an exact science and you can do the calculations yourself.
We don't have to pretend. If you're actually a video editor like you claim you should have a basic understanding of the physics behind lenses. I won't address any other points here because you didn't really make any, just that the math for lenses is an exact science and you can do the calculations yourself.
What makes you make that assertion?
You provided no backing for the claim, so I'm asking you what makes you think that was NASA's official stance.
Do I wish we had a better zoom in things?
Yes. Then I would have been able to get a better picture of wild turkeys last week.
I'm not sure what kind of answer you're expecting here.
Again I don't know what you want me to say. Should NASA have waited until the technology was created to verify/film them going?
I think it's a stupid argument and worthless.
It depends on what you mean by technology. Because the laser ranging retroreflector experiment uses "technology."