Obviously something is fishy, the US (NASA) declared a no fly or travel zone over all the Apollo landing sites saying they don't want to compromise the sites (this is from the project to have a bunch of groups of students from different countries to make rovers that would be sent to the moon, and was even mentioned on MSM) but just because its fishy doesn't make it any less fact that we cannot make a lense to see those sites from earth, amateurs make backyard telescopes AND lenses all the time, if it were possible we would have proof of it by now. That's not to say that we can't put up a satellite solely for the purpose at pointing at the moon, which by this point you would think they would have done it already.
We don't have to pretend. If you're actually a video editor like you claim you should have a basic understanding of the physics behind lenses. I won't address any other points here because you didn't really make any, just that the math for lenses is an exact science and you can do the calculations yourself.
Ok, I see the missing step in your logic now. Without anything specifically up there to zoom into prior to the "landings", how do we know that NASA knew this to be true?
I'm very skeptical of the official story to be clear. But what do you think about the Lunar Laser Range?
There's actually been several mirrors left on the surface of the moon that physicists and other scientists have been able to shoot with high powered lasers.
What's neat about the experiment is that labs all over the world can participate. There's been dozens of independently published papers on the moon mirror and the result impact on relativity and our understanding of lunar orbit.
While I agree with this, they have bounced powerful lasers off the surface before the mirrors were placed. Hitting the mirrors is possible with a weaker laser 100% but landing deniers will tell you that you just got a rock that was more reflective or something than the terrain around it.
So this is not good proof really, and I believe we did land by the way.
No one has ever been to the moon you window licking retards. That is the most basic as theories get.
Obviously something is fishy, the US (NASA) declared a no fly or travel zone over all the Apollo landing sites saying they don't want to compromise the sites (this is from the project to have a bunch of groups of students from different countries to make rovers that would be sent to the moon, and was even mentioned on MSM) but just because its fishy doesn't make it any less fact that we cannot make a lense to see those sites from earth, amateurs make backyard telescopes AND lenses all the time, if it were possible we would have proof of it by now. That's not to say that we can't put up a satellite solely for the purpose at pointing at the moon, which by this point you would think they would have done it already.
Bingo
We don't have to pretend. If you're actually a video editor like you claim you should have a basic understanding of the physics behind lenses. I won't address any other points here because you didn't really make any, just that the math for lenses is an exact science and you can do the calculations yourself.
What makes you make that assertion?
You provided no backing for the claim, so I'm asking you what makes you think that was NASA's official stance.
Ok, I see the missing step in your logic now. Without anything specifically up there to zoom into prior to the "landings", how do we know that NASA knew this to be true?
I'm very skeptical of the official story to be clear. But what do you think about the Lunar Laser Range?
Do I wish we had a better zoom in things?
Yes. Then I would have been able to get a better picture of wild turkeys last week.
I'm not sure what kind of answer you're expecting here.
Again I don't know what you want me to say. Should NASA have waited until the technology was created to verify/film them going?
I think it's a stupid argument and worthless.
It depends on what you mean by technology. Because the laser ranging retroreflector experiment uses "technology."
There's actually been several mirrors left on the surface of the moon that physicists and other scientists have been able to shoot with high powered lasers.
https://www.space.com/apollo-retroreflector-experiment-still-going-50-years-later.html
What's neat about the experiment is that labs all over the world can participate. There's been dozens of independently published papers on the moon mirror and the result impact on relativity and our understanding of lunar orbit.
Yep, there's one or two mirrors on Russian craft, yes.
While I agree with this, they have bounced powerful lasers off the surface before the mirrors were placed. Hitting the mirrors is possible with a weaker laser 100% but landing deniers will tell you that you just got a rock that was more reflective or something than the terrain around it. So this is not good proof really, and I believe we did land by the way.