SATANIC VERSES of the TALMUD. WARNING: Disgusting and Shocking Material.
(www.nwo-news.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
SATANIC VERSES OF THE TALMUD’S BLASPHEMIES AGAINST JESUS CHRIST, THE VIRGIN MARY, & ALL CHRISTIANS
‘Yashu’ (derogatory for ‘Jesus’) is in Hell being boiled in hot excrement.” (Gittin 57a)
[’Yashu’ is an acronym for the Jewish curse, ‘May his (Jesus) name be wiped out forevermore.’]
Yashu (Jesus) was sexually immoral and worshipped a brick.” (Sanhedrin 107b)
“Yashu (Jesus) was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness and refused to repent.” (Sotah 47a)
“Miriam the hairdresser had sex with many men.” (Shabbath 104b, Hebrew Edition only)
“She who was the descendant of princes and governors (the virgin Mary) played the harlot with carpenters.” (Sanhedrin 106a)
“Christians who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.” (Rosh Hashanah 17a)
https://web.archive.org/web/20160622010718/http://www.nwo-news.com/2016/03/18/satanic-verses-of-the-jewish-talmud/
This is the 53rd misquotation of Gittin 57a that I've found here, the most misquoted passage on Scored. It's a joke about a stock character that reflects Yeshu the student of ben Perachiah, who lived in the early 2nd century BC.
See more corrected Talmud quotes.
Thanks.
Guy, it's by an anon and follows the patterns of other jokes in the Talmud. It's a pagan, a Roman, and a Jew walking into a seance. It's already advertised as incongruous because the questionable Jew conducting the seance shouldn't have been doing so in the first place. The punchline is that even though all are speaking of torment the first two say to fight the Jews and the third says to convert to Judaism because he still likes the Jews. It has nothing to do with any theology and is more closely related to any American joke about any conspicuous person going to hell when people don't know theologically if s/he did or not.
You just commented on genetic fallacy. References to names can be determined based on context. I looked at all the Yeshu passages, there are three men named Yeshu from three different centuries (including Jesus) who each have their own passages, then there are a couple passages like this one that just mention Yeshu generically. The pagan is Balaam, who could've meant other people who had been compared to Balaam, and the Roman is Titus, who could've been father Titus Vespasian or son Titus Caesar. So it's a generic reference, not a specified person; it probably reflects on all three Yeshu figures.
There are also quite a few ladies named Mary in the Bible and I have never gotten them all straight. Every time the Bible says Mary it refers to one of them actually doing the thing it says she did. But there are debates about how many and whether some were the same person, and there are questions about some passages which person identified from elsewhere was intended. And Gittin 57a is a passage from which the particular Yeshu can not be specifically identified; in fact there are at least four readings for the name of the Jew (blank, Yeshu, Yeshu of Nazareth, and a sinner of Israel), so we can't insist on which is the original, though I think "Yeshu" is the likeliest. We can infer that some Jews regarded the passage (nonbindingly) as referring to Jesus of Nazareth, but we cannot infer that that is the original Talmudic text given that the Talmudists poke equal fun at three Yeshu figures.
I appreciate your challenges, but they might be better formed as questions rather than as an appeal to ignorance and a false equivalence. You might take the hint that, since I literally found 53 misquotes of this passage and listed them in the link, I might have a bit of evidence of the joke claim therein.
Blatantly false, right off the bat. "Yashu" is not derogatory at all. It is the Aramaic spelling of "Yeshua" or "Joshua." It is very simply a man's name. There is nothing derogatory about it. Associating Jesus with the name Yashu is problematic from the start, as the latter was a common name.
Yashu (Jesus) was sexually immoral and worshipped a brick.” (Sanhedrin 107b): False. This is a distortion of the truth by Van Hyning based upon a legendary story in this portion of the Talmud. As it is actually related, Jesus and his teacher met a woman at a wayside inn; Jesus admired her extreme beauty. For this the teacher severely admonished him and dismissed him as a pupil. The rabbis in the Talmud sharply criticized the teacher for his harshness and severity towards Jesus.
"Yashu (Jesus) was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness and refused to repent.” (Sotah 47a)** Sotah 47a simply doesn't state this at all. It concerns a disagreement between Jesus and a rabbinical mentor, but this isn't the message it conveys.
“Miriam the hairdresser had sex with many men.” (Shabbath 104b, Hebrew Edition only)
“She who was the descendant of princes and governors (the virgin Mary) played the harlot with carpenters.” (Sanhedrin 106a): It does not make an evaluation of anyone, but rather reports a dialogue; "It was taught, Rabbi Eliezer said to the Sages: But did not Ben Stada bring forth witchcraft from Egypt by means of scratches (in the form of charms) upon his flesh? He was a fool, answered they, and proof cannot be adduced from fools." The professional antisemites are relying on the theory that the Talmudic scholars meant Jesus when they referred to Ben Stada. A British scholar, R. Travers Herford, gives it as his opinion in "Christianity in Talmud and Midrash" (p. 37) that Ben Stada means Jesus of Nazareth. Further on, however, he says "...The Talmud has preserved only a very vague and confused recollection of Jesus" (p. 83). And he points out that some people argue "that there are in the Talmud two persons called Jesus, neither of whom is the historical Jesus of Nazareth" (p. 347).
“Christians who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.” Lastly, this is a reductive interpretation of how "judgement day" is explained in the Talmud. The text states that there are three ways that people will be judged on this day. Those that lived a virtuous life will ascend, those that sinned wickedly will be sent to Gehenna (which is not Hell, but purgatory) for "generations" and those in the middle will be sent to Gehenna for a year. The line that you're incorrectly quoting actually goes like this:
"But the heretics; and the informers; and the apostates [apikorsim]; and those who denied the Torah; and those who denied the resurrection of the dead; and those who separated from the ways of the Jewish community and refused to share the suffering; and those who cast their fear over the land of the living; and those who sinned and caused the masses to sin, for example, Jeroboam, son of Nebat, and his company; all of these people descend to Gehenna and are judged there for generations and generations..."
Which is, you know, nearly identical to the orientation of judgement day according to the Christians you seem to be so found of.
Shall I go on?
FUCKING LOL these TuMORS literally are Jews aren't they bahahaha. No wonders they've been getting their panties in a twist more so than usual lately
As expected, no rebuttal.
I don't need to rebuke Jew trolls, I'm going to prepare Christmas dinner for my friends and family :)
Have fun shitposting on conspiracies.win today. I'm sure mommy is very proud of you.